Alt text: three panels with “fossil fuel vehicles” (full of traffic),“electric vehicles” (full of traffic), “walking biking & public transit” (peaceful city with people riding bikes and trams)

  • gloriousspearfish@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is true. But just going from fossil to electrical vehicles will improve the air quality enormously and lower the noise a lot. It is a big improvement for city life.

    • Serdan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      While that is all correct, I think it’s worth keeping in mind that a lot of the air pollution and noise is from tires.

      • ratzki@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        …and heavier EV with more torque generate more micros plastics than most cars with combustion engines. In general, biking and public transport are best.

  • Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really want cycling highways though. Like bike lanes are for commuting. Where’s the lane for having fun? For cyclists, scooters, etc. 😔 this is still an unbelievably urban environment, too, and more integration of the natural environment would also be fucking nice.

  • Pyrozo007@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Okay, but you still need lorries and cars for goods and countryside dwellers, who need access to the city as well

    • kimpilled@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those things are still available, they’re just not the only option to the detriment of everyone else. Most people and things should be entering the city by rail, which removes the need for city destroying highways that are ever widening.