• herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 months ago

    I love this, but I suspect that the average person will see the last one and think, “Perfect! An orderly lawn and less insects.”

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      More time and effort. Bottom one takes 30 minutes to mow every 2 weeks. Each and everyone of those plants need to be maintained, trimmed and kept with weekly so it doesn’t look like a disaster. So unless you have 1-2 free hours a day, no one will be actually able to do the top and maintain it so it doesn’t turn to garbage.

      • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        You mean “so it doesn’t turn to nature”. You just think nature is garbage.

          • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Personally I respect nature, but don’t like it to be near me. So I prefer to live in places without lawns, like apartments. If I found myself by some miracle in possession of a house with a lawn (in this economy???), I would seek to destroy the lawn and replace it with more house. House is much more useful than lawn. Until I had accomplished that goal, it would just be a useless mass and I wouldn’t waste any time on it except to keep the footpath clear.

            The way white people are like “I want to be responsible for additional household chores so that I can have a useless biological dead zone that ‘looks nice’” is nonsense to me.