Excerpt:

The lawyer based her request on Article 245 (action incompatible with their duties) and Article 247 (serious misconduct) of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (TFEU).

The case concerned the disclosure of calls and text messages exchanged between von der Leyen and Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla through which both parties negotiated vaccine contracts during the COVID-19 crisis.

Following a criminal complaint filed by Frédéric Baldan, a Belgian lobbyist focusing on China-EU trade relations, the Belgian authorities initiated the case in early 2023. Subsequently, the governments of Hungary and Poland joined the lawsuit.

Von der Leyen kept “stubbornly refusing to disclose contracts for the purchase of COVID vaccines […and] the electronic messages she exchanged with Mr Bourla, CEO of Pfizer", according to the letter which said her actions offended “public morality” and “shatter the legitimate confidence that citizens should be able to have in all members of the European Commission”.

    • Nooodel@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      It baffles me how short lived the memory of people is. The whole affair around Gorch Fock should have made a persona non grata, especially after blatantly refusing any collaboration with the authorities (very convenient that all the incriminating chats were deleted and she can’t remember a thing anymore…). On the other hand, looking at the SPD and Scholz’ appearance for the Warburg Bank investigation was not any better.

      • CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        And yet, the ultra right found the expression of “green filth” due to one minor case of irregularities of a few officials who got into office before the department it is associated with got a green secretary.

        Btw, the Greens are the party with the fewest scandals of all parties that were ever in a german government (and at least one that (luckily) never was). And it ain’t even close.

        • Nooodel@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yep, and right they are. We’re dangerous terrorists and our opinion that we should change our way of living instead of destroying the planet before it’s too late is a very dangerous thought that terrorizes their simplistic minds.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The plaintiff in the Pfizergate affair has called on the European Council to force the resignation of EU executive chief Ursula von der Leyen and the rest of her Commissioners in a letter seen by Euronews.

    The letter from the plaintiff’s lawyer was addressed to all 27 EU leaders and Manfred Weber, the president of von der Leyen’s European People’s Party (EPP).

    The plaintiff asked EU leaders “to refer the [Pfizergate] matter to the Court of Justice so that it may order the compulsory resignation and forfeiture of pension rights not only of Mrs von der Leyen but also of all the European Commissioners who make up her Commission.”

    The case concerned the disclosure of calls and text messages exchanged between von der Leyen and Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla through which both parties negotiated vaccine contracts during the COVID-19 crisis.

    Von der Leyen kept “stubbornly refusing to disclose contracts for the purchase of COVID vaccines […and] the electronic messages she exchanged with Mr Bourla, CEO of Pfizer", according to the letter which said her actions offended “public morality” and “shatter the legitimate confidence that citizens should be able to have in all members of the European Commission”.

    “It is clear that Mrs von der Leyen and the members of her Commission are no longer in a position to perform their duties," according to the letter, finding that this "violates the principle of good administration provided for in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.”


    The original article contains 512 words, the summary contains 245 words. Saved 52%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!