• livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Australia isn’t immune to populism.

    Narcissistic sociopaths may present differently in Australia than they do in the US but that doesn’t mean they’re not a thing.

  • Mountaineer@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    We elect “Donald Trumps” all the time.
    Clive Palmer.
    Craig Kelly.
    Barnaby Joyce.
    Bob Katter.
    Pauline Hanson.
    Jacqui Lambie.

    They only differ from Trump in degree, not in tactics.
    This “article” is a thought bubble, not even a fully fleshed out one.

    It isn’t the crimes that Trump is accused of committing that are evil, it’s the lieing, manipulating, etc that got him in position to do it.
    The shit that Palmer did to get elected were basically strong arming an entire electorate to support him.
    The shit that Hanson has done through funneling electoral funds through friendly advertising companies SHOULD be considered fraud.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Bob Katter and Jacqui Lambie don’t belong anywhere near this list. Neither of them are remotely Trumpian. You and I might disagree with their philosophies, but there’s no denying that they are completely genuine and they fight for what they believe their constituents really want.

      I’d argue Pauline Hanson kinda fits that description too, although it’s certainly far less clear with her. But what’s definitely true of Hanson and those other two is that they are focused on the issues, not on themselves. When you think of Pauline Hanson, the first thing you think is “racist”, it’s not “self-obsessed” or some other word like that, which would be the first thing about Trump.

      Craig Kelly and Barnaby Joyce I don’t know quite as much about, but the general sense I get of them is more along the same lines. Bad political positions, bad people in their personal lives, but not focused on bigging themselves up like Trump is.

      Which leaves Palmer. Who definitely does fit that. But who, it’s very notable, did not have a lot of electoral success. He got himself elected once, in one seat. His party has a single seat in the Senate, which no longer really even derives itself from Palmer who hasn’t been strongly publicly involved in the party since long before that Senator won his election latest election. Palmer doesn’t have the capacity to become a Trump because he doesn’t have the capacity to win the widespread national success that would be necessary for that.

      • Mountaineer@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Oh, I thought we were talking about “bad people who shouldn’t be anywhere near political levers”, not “egotisitical idiots”.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zoneOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Did you read the article? I thought it was pretty clear that it was focused on Trump’s egotism, and Australia’s dislike for that style of interaction.

      • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Thank you for the common sense response. Even Barry from insiders has said that Bob katter is probably the most representative politician in the country. He truly is there representing his electorate. Love it or loath it, it’s true.

        • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I agree, which speaks volumes as to why we’re in this fuckig mess. He’s representative of the deplorables.

  • Gamers_Mate@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    That attitude is what got him Elected in the US.

    Never underestimate a conman that plays on Xenophobia to get what they want.

    Our ranked choice voting may be leagues ahead of first past the post but it is still a possibility we should look out for.

  • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    No. That’s incorrect. It’s because we have compulsory voting. It stops extremists on either side getting too much power.

    It keeps our politics centre.

        • ⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zoneM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          Still better than the alternative - at least if we had the Republicans and Democrats here, a vote for an alternative candidate doesn’t automatically hurt the “lesser of two evils” candidate that you would support if you had to pick one or the other. That being said the fact that the Head of State (Governor-General) doesn’t have any real power (apart from dissolving parliament) and that the leader of our government is elected by the parliament from the parliament makes it so bad leaders (and good ones unfortunately) can be removed very easily.

  • flathead@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    this is especially rich coming from a Queensland paper… how soon we forget…

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joh_Bjelke-Petersen

    Here are some snippets to save you reading the whole thing…

    “Within months of becoming premier, Bjelke-Petersen encountered his first controversy over allegations of conflict of interest”

    "three weeks after becoming premier, Bjelke-Petersen’s government gave two companies, Exoil NL and Transoil NL—in both of which he was a major shareholder—six-year leases to prospect for oil on the Great Barrier Reef "

    “Plans by Country Party members to support a Labor Party vote of no confidence in parliament were quashed after the intervention of party president Robert Sparkes, who warned that anyone who voted against Bjelke-Petersen would lose their status as the party’s candidate at the next election.”

    “Bjelke-Petersen seized on the controversial visit of the Springboks, the South African rugby union team, in 1971 to consolidate his position as leader with a display of force.”

    “A crowd of demonstrators also mounted a peaceful protest outside the Springboks’ Wickham Terrace motel and were chased on foot by police moments after being ordered to retreat, with many police attacking the crowd with batons, boots and fists. It was one of a series of violent attacks by police on demonstrators during the Springboks’ visit to Queensland”

    “Bjelke-Petersen praised police for their ‘restraint’ during the demonstrations and rewarded the police union for its support with an extra week’s leave for every officer in the state. He described the tension over the Springboks’ tour as ‘great fun’, ‘a game of chess in the political arena’. The crisis, he said, ‘put me on the map’.”

    “Bjelke-Petersen began regular media and parliamentary attacks on the Whitlam Labor government, vowing to have it defeated, and he and Whitlam exchanged frequent verbal barbs, culminating in the prime minister’s 1975 description of the Queensland premier as ‘a Bible-bashing bastard … a paranoic, a bigot and fanatical’”

    “Bjelke-Petersen also vehemently opposed the Whitlam government’s proposal for Medicare, a publicly funded universal health care system.”

    “In 1975, Bjelke-Petersen played what turned out to be a key role in the political crisis that brought down the Whitlam government. Bjelke-Petersen alleged that Queensland police investigations had uncovered damaging documentation in relation to the Loans Affair. This documentation was never made public and these allegations remained unsubstantiated”

    “television cameras captured an incident during the confrontation in which a police inspector struck a 20-year-old female protester over the head with his baton, injuring her. When Police Commissioner Ray Whitrod announced he would hold an inquiry, a move supported by Police Minister Max Hodges, Bjelke-Petersen declared there would be no inquiry. He told reporters he was tired of radical groups believing they could take over the streets.”

    “In 1977, Bjelke-Petersen announced that ‘the day of street marches is over’, warning protesters, ‘Don’t bother applying for a march permit. You won’t get one. That’s government policy now!’”

    “When, after two ugly street battles between police and right-to-march protesters, the Uniting Church Synod called on the government to change the march law, Bjelke-Petersen accused the clergy of ‘supporting communists’”

    "The government’s increasingly hardline approach to civil liberties prompted Queensland National Party president Robert Sparkes to warn the party that it was developing a dangerous ‘propaganda-created, ultra-conservative, almost fascist image.’ "

    “Florence Bjelke-Petersen (his wife) was elected to the Senate in October 1980 as a National Party member and six weeks later Joh was successful for a fifth time as premier at the 1980 Queensland election, with the Nationals converting a 27.9 percent primary vote—their highest ever—into 35 of the parliament’s 82 seats, or 43 percent of seats.”

    “In 1984 Bjelke-Petersen was created a Knight Commander of the Order of St Michael and St George (KCMG) for ‘services to parliamentary democracy’. Author Evan Whitton suggests the premier had made the nomination himself.”

    “A ‘Joh for PM’ campaign was conceived in late 1985, driven largely by a group of Gold Coast property developers, promoting Bjelke-Petersen as the most effective conservative challenger to Labor Prime Minister Bob Hawke, and at the 1986 Queensland election he recorded his biggest electoral win ever, winning 49 of the state’s 89 seats with 39.6 percent of the primary vote.”