• Eheran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    The other way around is not better. Imagine risking that much just to smoke.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I take the point of view that no one should be choosing what does or doesn’t go in to someone else’s body. If she’s aware of the risks, it shouldn’t be anyone else’s business whether she smokes or not.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        When you are representing a whole nation, you have quite a bit more responsibility as some random person. That extends far beyond illegal things, like general attitude etc. too. If you are an asshole, you are also going to get kicked out.

        • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I somewhat agree, when she is representing a wider group in public, there is an enhanced level of responsibility.

          What she does when she’s not in the public though, as long as it’s not illegal, shouldn’t be anyone else’s business. My understanding of this case implies she was attempting to be subtle about smoking.

          Around young children who could be inspired by you? Don’t smoke.

          In your own house minding your own business? Smoke like a chimney for all I care.