- cross-posted to:
- nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
- cross-posted to:
- nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
deleted by creator
It isn’t specifically about flooding. Flooding is a fairly manageable risk in the western Netherlands. As strange as it may sound for an area that is below sea level. The true problem for Gouda is its subsoil. The city is built on a thick peat layer, which is subsiding. Gouda is by far the most vulnerable historic city in that regard.
As you can see on the photo in the article, the water level in some canals is like 10 or 20 cm below the street level. Water so shallow will start creeping upward in your walls. The streets and to a lesser extent buildings are slowly subsiding. So why not just lower the water level? Well, this accelerates the oxidation and compression of peat, causing faster subsiding. You could heighten the street, but the extra weight will cause more subsidence. This is the conundrum Gouda is in.
It’s getting in the way of my chess supply, I went from concern to deeply invested
Mostly, they seem to have looked in detail at Gouda.
To everyone enjoying their Gouda abroad, the milk industry has a huge role in the land subsidence and peat oxidation in the western and northern Netherlands.
Maybe there is a Gouda loving billionaire out there who will finally see the error of their ways
You ever seen a cheesemonger in the Netherlands cut the wax off a wheel of Gouda? It’s legitimately impressive. Fuck I need some Gouda now. They make a goat variety which makes my mouth water…
Edit: Howdah.