https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/9436237

@MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
(replaced with my own user profile, as I’m not trying to fill other users’ inboxes for no real reason)(also, this somehow worked right when making this post, but not the original comment)
[@MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de](/u/MachineFab812)
https://discuss.tchncs.de/comment/9293054 https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/9620373 https://jlai.lu/comment/6487794

While we’re at it, am I missing at instance-agnostic method for linking posts as well?

  • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    No, I’m pretty sure that’s a quirk of how the fediverse works. Posts, comments, etc are in two places:

    • the instance the community is hosted on
    • your instance (i.e. unique to users of your instance)

    You’ll want the first (the permalink) for general posting, and the second for your own use. However, lemmy doesn’t handle the first very well, so both options kinda suck.

    I honestly don’t think there’s a good solution to this. We can make improvements though, such as lemmy figuring out that a link is a lemmy link, either through special syntax (like @user@instance or !community@instance) or checking a list of known instances, but the real problem is that users need to be aware of instances, and that’s poor UX imo.

    I’m working on an alternative to lemmy that solves this (and has a bunch of other drawbacks that I hope are acceptable), but I hope it’s not necessary and someone more clever than me can solve it.

    • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      If the comments/posts were just numbered relative to their communities instead of generated by each instance, there wouldn’t have to be this disconnect at all.
      /c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/18177167
      Would be THE instance-agnostic link for that post, and
      /c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/9620373
      THE instance-agnostic link for that comment.

      Don’t even have to redo how the instances generate content numbers for posts/comments generated locally, but set them to pull such numbers in for each post/comment mirrored from another instance. Not even slightly hard to come up with, though I don’t have my laptop with me so I’ll refrain from speaking one the difficulty of implimentation versus all the “legacy-numbered” content already out there.

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Yeah, that would work within lemmy, and it would make it easier to detect whether a link is to lemmy or something else (look for /c/<community chars>@<hostname chars>/<rest>). But you’ll still have the issue of clicking a link elsewhere (say, a blog post) to an instance that’s not yours, so you still wouldn’t be able to directly comment w/o copy/pasting part of the URL to your instance.

        That said, that change alone would reduce a lot of friction for users. My point is that it still doesn’t fix the root of the problem. I guess we could use a browser extension to auto-redirect to your instance of choice, but that’s just yet another barrier for users.

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        but set them to pull such numbers in for each post/comment mirrored from another instance.

        I think the asynchronous way lemmy handles creating a comment/post and then sending it would make this difficult.