Cowbee [he/they]

Actually, this town has more than enough room for the two of us

He/him or they/them, doesn’t matter too much

Marxist-Leninist ☭

Interested in Marxism-Leninism? Check out my “Read Theory, Darn it!” introductory reading list!

  • 27 Posts
  • 8.34K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: December 31st, 2023

help-circle





  • It’s the opposite, you’ve been peddling conspiracy theory nonsense. HTS has roots in ISIS, the Soviet Union didn’t “conquer half of Europe,” and more. I’ve given you multiple verified sources (some even used as sources for Wikipedia articles), and your only response is that it doesn’t sound right to you, so it must not be true.

    Really, when one person has been giving facts and sources, and the other talks about how their grandmother said the Nazis weren’t all bad, it’s pretty obvious which one is the troll.






  • Yes, the death counts from the HTS regime are staggering, having ISIS control Syria ended up being even worse. Go figure.

    I’d like verified historical texts and records. Museums and personal anecdotes can be twisted far easier.

    Don’t speak German, so there’s nothing I can really check, though I don’t have much confidence in the anticommunist organizations of a country that was never de-nazified.

    For you, I recommend the book Russian Justice.

    The Soviets weren’t Imperialist, the fact that you continue to confidently spout utter nonsense like thinking ISIS is somehow better than the Assad regime just because the West likes working with them more and your insistence that I ignore the mountains of evidence and first-hand accounts that go against what you and the other user believe means I can generally ignore your statements.


  • Syria is far worse under the current regime than it was under Assad, as you say, you don’t actually know what you’re talking about. Pretty self-aware of you to say.

    As for facts and data, no, I get mine from mainstream sources and data from after the opening of the Soviet Archives. Just because I don’t bother with PragerU doesn’t mean I’m wrong, you haven’t actually been able to address anything I’ve said on a factual basis so you resort to dodging and dismissing.

    You do that again with the DDR, you just say I don’t know anything rather than actually addressing what I say. What’s the point? Who are you convincing? Nobody, at this point, you have nothing to actually contest what I say and you aren’t convincing me.

    As for torture and despotism, I don’t approve, that’s why I’m against the US Empire and its puppet regimes.

    Thanks for the advice, but I already do, minus the travel. I’d like to some day. I suggest you do the same, and read books like Shock Doctrine and The Jakarta Method, which detail how 7 million people died during the transition from Socialism to Capitalism, and read about how the majority of people living in post-Soviet states wish they were still Socialist.





  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.mltoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldcapitalism
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If you can be more specific, I can take a crack at explaining, but I can’t really go off of what you’ve provided other than the transformation “problem,” which I can address in short and link what I believe to be a more in-depth explanation of common criticisms of Marx’s Law of Value.

    Essentially, Marx’s hypothesis that there existed a formula that he was never able to find that could solve for the difference between Capital Intensity and the notion of profit equalization across industries ended up being wrong, in that such a formula did not exist. However, we can see with empirical evidence that Marx’s Law of Value ends up being correct, in that profitability is closely tied to Capital Intensity, and that equalization of profit across industries really just does not come into play outside of noise.

    This wasn’t because Marx was stupid or anything, but because math itself had not advanced enough to show that such a transformation did not exist, but this does not disprove Marx’s Law of Value, rather, it affirms its more important foundations while dismissing a hypothesis of Marx’s that he never fully developed, nor could he have.

    Here’s a link to the article.

    As for the Vanguard, you should read about the Mass Line and Democratic Centralism, both address your issues.


  • Socialism is stable, yes.

    As for Xu and Du, those are not the sole figures on Socialism in China, nor does that definition actually hold for Socialism. Socialism is determined by which is primary in an economic system, be it Public ownership or private, and in the PRC it is public. Large firms and heavy industry is nearly soley in the public sector, while the private sector is dominated by small firms.

    As for Russia, 7 million people died due to the reintroduction of Capitalism, social safety nets were stripped bare and workers rights fell dramatically. Socialism was better than Tsarism and was better than Capitalism has been, whether you feel disgusted by facts or not it’s the truth.



  • What do you mean by “providing the same comfort?” What are you comparing it to, peer countries, or Imperialist ones like the United States? China is Socialist and is becoming the undisputed world power, while dramatically reducing poverty. The Soviet Union was better for its people than modern Capitalism has been, or former Tsarism.