

Yes it blows my mind everyone can’t see all the historically perfectly fine software starting to crumble to dust


Yes it blows my mind everyone can’t see all the historically perfectly fine software starting to crumble to dust


I’m sure there were pockets but it legitimately seemed like that dragon had been slain until recently. Trying to assign more meaning to scrum points has been in vogue for a while though.


output is up (more code, more commits, bigger diffs)
We’ve known measuring output by lines of code is counterproductive for a long time.


At what point have I expressed support for the use of LLMs?
You haven’t explicitly but trying to downplay environmental impact sure is suspicious. 1/1000th may not be a “main cause”, but that’s a huge proportion, and it is growing. Is it OK to be concerned when it hits 1/500th? 1/100th? It was zero not too long ago.
do not poison conversations on the actual causes behind our climate problem.
You know damn well that’s not what is happening here. This was a conversation on an article about AI so of course that is the topic.


This guy’s blog gets posted all the time here and 75% of the time it’s him being a huge slimeball


But it’s a sizable and growing factor so trying to make out like it’s not a good reason to not support using big LLMs is nonsensical. Falling back away from the context of the conversation to assert that you’re technically correct is ridiculous.


“They’re just using it wrong”. If no one can use it right maybe it’s not that great a tool.


You think 1/1000th of emissions and growing for something that isn’t nearly as useful as boosters pretend is no big deal?


Another aspect is that “some of the more tedious tasks” already had tons of ways to be sped up but the brain-dead LLM pushers had never actually tried to optimize their workflows before and thought LLMs would make them be as good as their much more competent peers without actually learning anything.


So they came to the conclusion that the actually competent people they refused to listen to said after touching it once.
Python obviously isn’t useless, but it is both slow, and if you’re making serious software, the worst developer experience I’ve ever had to deal with. It makes the easy things easy and the hard things hard, so to speak


Pretty sure COBOL jobs getting unusually high pay is a myth. I don’t really care what I work on so I’ve looked and they just don’t seem to pay any higher than anything else
Yup they could use nano -/0, or they could just use micro.
A note: I couldn’t find -/ referenced online easily though when I checked it is indeed there. On Mac nano redirects to pico by default which doesn’t have that either. I think it’s understandable someone would just choose to use micro
It’s not that they want more features - it’s that in micro for instance copy is ctrl+c which everyone already knows, where in nano it’s different


Yes at the very least you are committing yourself to ignoring or reimplementing all the accessibility features you get for free in HTML


Sure, but it’s only 6 years old, much newer than every one in this post, to my knowledge only has applications rather than libraries, and sources packages from the windows store or the community repository which is just manifests rather than the actual code or binaries.
In other words you’re technically correct, but it’s rather irrelevant


It’s not new, but you’re wrong about personal data not factoring in. Companies will absolutely try to low ball you if you’re unemployed, or offer you less if you volunteer your current salary, or offer you more if you’re getting other offers.
This new stuff is a problem because they’re going to end up colluding through software just like landlords and it should obviously be illegal but they’ll get away with it until people catch on and the law catches up, or forever depending on location.


They probably should have made it actually work on PC if they wanted it to sell. Now that I’ve skipped it because it was poorly optimized and they kept not fixing it, it is officially in the “maybe buy on sale after whatever expansion they do” bucket. Iirc it also has denuvo which is a hard pass for single player games. I might would forgive it on something online like monster hunter but it’s still another negative point on the “will I buy it” chart
“It’s just a false positive” while a regular person has their life fucked up. Whether it’s first party or another company hired to do the job, these giant companies don’t deserve any grace when they abuse DMCA.