Okay grandpa, let’s get you to
bedprison.
Okay grandpa, let’s get you to
bedprison.
I propose a new standard practice during debates: At some point, open a box in the center of the stage with 100 or so flies in it, then keep a tally of how many gravitate to each speaker.
Most docs have some kind of internet presence nowadays, so definitely look them up. Also in the later preop stages when you talk to your OR nurse, look your nurse in the eye and just straight up ask “Would you be comfortable with this doctor operating on you?” They won’t be actually allowed to talk shit on their surgeon, but the second of panicked silence as they try to come up with some kind of non-answer without blatantly lying will tell you everything you need to know.
This might be like 30 mins before your surgery - you have the right to refuse up until you go unconscious. It’ll feel dirty, but those standards exist for a reason.
Oh, well shit. Dr Death was before this shit, but it sounds like basically Dr Death 2.0.
…kinda makes me wonder how common this is.
No, he never got any media attention that I’m aware of. My concern is that he’s just hopping from hospital to hospital - hiring on, fucking up, killing someone, getting fired, hiring on, fucking up, killing someone, etc.
Hospitals are pretty protective of their reputation and their doctors; and death is a thing that can happen in surgery so it be swept off as a “Oh well, patient signed off on the risks; and oh hey, this Dr said some mean things to our staff, so let’s fire him for that and hope we don’t make national headlines…”
I’ve worked with a lot of good and a lot of bad surgeons, but even the bad ones aren’t usually dangerous bad, but like slow af, sub-optimal but passable outcomes, shit like that.
I’ve worked with ONE who was just absolute shit at his job… and his incompetence got at least one patient killed.
He got axed pretty quick… hopefully his license was revoked and he got charged with murder, but I never got any details of post-firing.
“Your Nazi coworkers/family don’t have to know you voted to save the US. Harris/Walz 2024”
Crazy that these reporters can understand what Trump is trying to articulate around that mouthful of Putin’s dick.
Couldn’t care less what’s in Trump’s or Harris’s pants, nor whether or not voting for either is ‘manly’.
I don’t want a fucking Nazi in the white house; and Harris’s policy stances are for the most part ones that the US needs.
I could see gender becoming a factor as a tie breaker if all else were equal, just for representation sake, but all else is not equal: another Trump presidency would be disastrous for way more than just the US, vs Harris being actually qualified for the job. There is no contest here.
*snaps gloves*
The force is about to be with you.
Trump-Zelenskyy feud
Which is synonymous with Putin-Zelenskyy feud. I don’t think anyone is surprised that Putin’s bitch is doing Putin’s biding.
Oh for fuck’s sake. It’s time to just rip the bandaid off of this one.
…yeah this is the GOP - women suffering/dying is a feature, not a bug.
Never forget that the cruelty is the point.
Three more. Then we’ll have 53, a prime number, and truly be one nation indivisible.
How would this look in actuality?
Probably a bit like this,
https://www.opb.org/news/article/federal-law-enforcement-unmarked-vehicles-portland-protesters/
Here, take these bombs.
WHOA WTF MAN, I DIDN’T SAY USE THEM!!
Also here, have some more bombs.