How much is it now?

100%

Nice, keep up the good work!

I have no dislike of Christianity in particular, i have a problem with religion as a tool to make a distinction between us and them. I am aware I am doing it too, but I am not an institution. The point of my question, which was genuine, was to understand your comment better. It is meaner than necessary.

Here there are plenty of Christian organizations as well doing very good things, but in general the people most vocal about doing Christian things are not more about people following their rules than about doing something meaningful for people in need. Seeing the current regime embracing Christianity while also limiting food aid or killing people without a trial in international waters remind me more of the type that talk(!) about Christian values, than that it reminds me of the people who work at a food bank or a homeless shelter.

Were* they feeding the poor, housing the unhoused etc, or was it all talk?

Where Were these things they did or only things they said they do?

Do you mean the Christianity inside or outside the US? Because to me this does not in anyway sound like US Christianity. Maybe a little bit their preaching, but surely not their actions.

Too bad, my anus is not available

I’d argue it’d help too - but to add about the situation here: the reason the police is not prioritizing this is because they believe so many people would object their fines it would place a heavy burden on our justice system. A judge would have too look at all those individual streets (perhaps times 2, if the situation is different in each direction because of a side road or something). The people objecting would have a point because there are laws preventing government from doing things that are unfair to the individual. In other words, a speed camera on a big road is much more fair than a speed camera in a small street. Weird stuff.

In the Netherlands there is a trend of lowering speeds but not enough enforcement (something with local governments not having the authority, and national police having different priorities). Not sure if any scientific data but it is empirically clear to both sides that just changing the signs is not enough - if a road feels like a 50kph road, people will continue driving 50kph. If a road is redesigned, people stop doing that.

Slower speeds result into less serious injuries and less fatal accidents, but it seems people are only willing and or able to adhere to lower speeds if the design of the road calls for that safer speed.

People just want to see their bias confirmed. They read this and think ‘see, i knew he wasn’t as popular as they say’.

Both upvotes and downvotes doubled since I wrote that, I have learned a valuable lessons today.

Someone beat you to it, the link was posted to this community 4 hours earlier: https://feddit.org/post/34037500

It’s my fault for thinking that comment didn’t need /s

Either way it does have (as of right now) 23 upvotes.

These people really need to stop complaining. It was their choice to buy a macha latte, and now they’re crying they can’t afford a house? Just grow up already. I’m so not feeling sorry for this dumb generation.

To be fair, if i had committed crimes of war i would need therapy too.

The drone lost connection and was only sitting there in hover mode when the guy kicked it.

Maybe, but it was still a feat of inadvisable athleticism. It’s in the article.