• LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    16:10 has always been superior to both but I quite like my second 4:3 monitor. Also I was referring to mobile devices obviously (where most internet traffic comes from), and 4:3 isn’t a size measurement.

    • SharkAttak@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Uh… I don’t know if it sounded snarky, but mine was a joke. “If the extra space of 16:9 is going to be occupied by ads, better go back to 4:3 aspect ratio.”

      • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh I’m sorry, I didn’t get that. 16:9 doesn’t really add “extra space” to 4:3, it’s just a different ratio of the same exact space in terms of horizontal to vertical proportions. A monitor of a certain size will have the same diameter regardless of aspect ratio.