• stopthatgirl7@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, so, remember how the train workers wanted to strike because they knew the way things were going, there would be more train derailments and accidents, and Biden quashed it? About that.

    • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is always the argument that people bring up around this, and its woefully misrepresented. Biden signed a bill that 75% of the railroad unions agreed on. The bill was designed to be the bare minimum needed by the unions to continue their work. He stated after signing the bill that work still needed to be done, and that the fight for the unions for better wages and safety was not over, but he was signing this bill to prevent a total shut down of the economy that relies heavily on railroad infrastructure. Biden never said that the unions couldn’t continue to address the shortcomings of the system. He didn’t take away their rights to strike, or force them into compliance. He merely signed a bill (again, approved by the majority of the unions) to make sure that the railways stay open. If there is a continued failure of the railways, it’s not on him, it is because nothing has changed since then. There is still work to be done, it was only ever meant to be a stopgap to avoid a much larger crisis. If you think the writer’s strike and SAG-AFTRA was a big deal because movies couldn’t be made, imagine what would happen to the US if food supply lines were completely severed. Do you think the produce you get in the grocery store was all farmed within walking distance?

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A majority of the workers rejected that agreement and that’s what matters. Stop trying to frame this as being the majority.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s his fault because he’s the one that signed the fucking bill.

            The workers were being represented effectively! They were going to go on strike! He and congress worked together to stop them for “the economy”. He stopped their unions from representing them effectively by forcing them to accept an inferior contract that they rejected.

            The fact that you’re defending Biden on this is disgusting. Bet you defend him for supporting Israel’s genocide too.

            • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              He signed a bill that was agreed upon by 75% of the Unions. You act like Biden sat in a room with a quarter million railroad workers and told them to go fuck themselves. He met with their leadership, and the majority of the leadership agreed on the bill. If only 25% of the leaders had agreed, Biden may have done more, but getting 75% of any group to agree on politics is a fucking miracle, and you take those when you get them.

              You can’t say that the workers were being represented properly and in the same breath say that their representatives went against their wishes when they supported the bill. It seems like you have an axe to grind about Biden, and you are letting your feelings about him affect your decision making process. You should probably vote 3rd party next year to cleanse your conscience.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                He signed a bill that was agreed upon by 75% of the Unions.

                That’s not how democracy works!

                One person, one vote. There were multiple unions that were voting together as a group, and each union represented different numbers of people. The unions that represented the most people voted against the agreement and that’s why they were going to strike!

                The majority. Of workers. Voted to strike. The majority. Of workers. Were betrayed by Biden and continue to be betrayed by shits like you. The rank-and-file voted to strike and they were going to strike and then Biden shut it down.

                When a majority of voters vote “no” then the result is no, no matter what unions they belong to. It’s called solidarity. You don’t seem to understand how voting works, how unions work, or what Biden actually did to stop the strike from happening.

                If I wanted to cast a vote that matters this election I would cast a 9mm ballot into my fucking mouth. Seems more productive.

                • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  If I wanted to cast a vote that matters this election I would cast a 9mm ballot into my fucking mouth. Seems more productive.

                  I knew we would find something to agree on.

                  I’ll edit this with a real reply:

                  That’s not how democracy works!

                  One person, one vote. There were multiple unions that were voting together as a group, and each union represented different numbers of people.

                  Welcome to unionizing. You give up the voice of the many to have a stronger singular voice. Unions aren’t genies there to grant the wishes of every person that pays dues, they represent the masses by giving them a single voice. You are looking at this like all of the people that were put out agreed 100% with each other, and we know that isn’t true. They all had different visions of how things should work, and while that venn diagram had a good amount of overlap, it wasn’t unanimous. If it was, they wouldn’t need a Union rep. It doesn’t matter how many people each Union had, it was still a singular class. If you don’t like that, then I invite you to figure out a better way to do it, and then present your findings to America’s labor unions and get them all to agree on it.

                  When a majority of voters vote “no” then the result is no, no matter what unions they belong to. It’s called solidarity. You don’t seem to understand how voting works, how unions work, or what Biden actually did to stop the strike from happening.

                  When a majority of voters vote “no”, then their representative votes “no”. And when that vote is cast along with all of the other representatives, then the votes are tallied and a consensus is reached. Please don’t lecture me on how to vote, I’ve seen the Schoolhouse Rock video, I’m well aware of how things work. If you don’t like this system, then you should find some like minded people, and form a group, and then using the power of your collective voice tell the government that it needs to change… wait… that’s just a fucking union.