• Kit Sorens@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve only experienced that from them since I’ve known them. Not one wants a good faith discussion until you grovel to their fundamentalist tripe. Unity to them means blindly following their half-understood theories of centuries-dead men, and anyone who questions a lick of it gets the 4chan swarm treatment.

        • Kuori [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          OP literally did not attempt to have any discussion of any kind, and explicitly said they had no interest in doing so

          that’s the definition of “not in good faith” homie

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No, good faith argument is being a debatelord, as was explained to me at length in the last post. People who just happen to see the post and respond are all brigading if they come from an instance that has a cross-post. Them’s the rules.

              Don’t bullshit me that there is a proper way to argue with that fucker, he demonstrated at length that there was not.

                  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You literally came into my thread and started insulting me to third parties, baby. Don’t act all huffy when you take what you give.

                    You’re clearly angry because I didn’t engage with your sealioning. Take a break. Not everyone owes you attention.