GiddyGap@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agoBiden vs. Trump: Who is leading the polls?www.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up110arrow-down140
arrow-up1-30arrow-down1external-linkBiden vs. Trump: Who is leading the polls?www.reuters.comGiddyGap@lemm.ee to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square28fedilink
minus-squarebtaf45@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoThen the only thing that would improve it would be a better implementation of democracy. Not a slide backwards into neofascism.
minus-squaretsonfeir@lemm.eecakelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoWhere every vote counts, and everyone votes on everything, and popular vote wins. Ranked voting for 3+ options would be good too.
minus-squarebtaf45@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 months agoI think what we need to start with is an objective evaluation of how good our democracy is compared to other countries. Something like this: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/freedom-index-by-country This rank would use object criteria e.g. Is every vote for every office weighted equally? Does the system disfavor more than 2 parties? How easy is it to vote? Are voting districts determined objectively?
Then the only thing that would improve it would be a better implementation of democracy. Not a slide backwards into neofascism.
Where every vote counts, and everyone votes on everything, and popular vote wins. Ranked voting for 3+ options would be good too.
I think what we need to start with is an objective evaluation of how good our democracy is compared to other countries. Something like this:
https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/freedom-index-by-country
This rank would use object criteria e.g.
Is every vote for every office weighted equally?
Does the system disfavor more than 2 parties?
How easy is it to vote?
Are voting districts determined objectively?