Yup Horde still suffers from this issue, though it seems to have more promise than the others considering the second glass is way closer to being full than anything I’ve sen from openAI or Gemini demonstrations.
Maybe there’s hope to fix this issue here.
I only tried one model so if you know of a different horde model which works better for this and actually gives a full glass please reply below letting me know, maybe even ask the horde bot to generate it right here.
What I mean is that if people keep making it produce garbage tied to some keyword or phrase and people publish said garbage, that’ll only strengthen AIs’ neural network between the bad data and that keyword, so AI results for such trees will drift even further away from the truth.
Wait, this seems incredible. Do you have to be in the same instance or does it work anywhere? @aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com Can you draw a smart phone without a rotary phone dial?
It works on any instance that is federated to dbzer0. You have to use annotated mentions though since that’s what the bot uses. Like this: @aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com draw for me a smart phone without a rotary phone dial
Yeah, you also have to say draw for me. I don’t think the bot recognizes queries otherwise. Also editing mentions doesn’t work, they have to be new, fresh posts with the mention. Just a quirk with Lemmy and how mentions work here.
I wonder, does AI horde also have this problem too?
@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com draw for me a wine glass completely filled to the top style:flux
Here are some images matching your request
Prompt: a wine glass completely filled to the top
Style: flux
Yup Horde still suffers from this issue, though it seems to have more promise than the others considering the second glass is way closer to being full than anything I’ve sen from openAI or Gemini demonstrations. Maybe there’s hope to fix this issue here.
I only tried one model so if you know of a different horde model which works better for this and actually gives a full glass please reply below letting me know, maybe even ask the horde bot to generate it right here.
deleted by creator
Here are some images matching your request
Prompt: a picture of three Araucaria angustifolia trees
Style: flux
deleted by creator
So we could keep having it generate these and poison its own training data!
No. What are you on about?
What I mean is that if people keep making it produce garbage tied to some keyword or phrase and people publish said garbage, that’ll only strengthen AIs’ neural network between the bad data and that keyword, so AI results for such trees will drift even further away from the truth.
That fourth picture is just four penguins in a trenchcoat
Wait, this seems incredible. Do you have to be in the same instance or does it work anywhere? @aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com Can you draw a smart phone without a rotary phone dial?
It works on any instance that is federated to dbzer0. You have to use annotated mentions though since that’s what the bot uses. Like this:
@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com draw for me a smart phone without a rotary phone dial
Here are some images matching your request
Prompt: a smart phone without a rotary phone dial
Style: flux
Guess AIhorde had some trouble understanding the prompt too…
Thank you very much. I’ll give it another shot with the annotation.
@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com
Draw a picture of a poker table without any poker chips what so ever
I think I messed up the annotation
Yeah, you also have to say draw for me. I don’t think the bot recognizes queries otherwise. Also editing mentions doesn’t work, they have to be new, fresh posts with the mention. Just a quirk with Lemmy and how mentions work here.
I appreciate your patience with me here :P
@aihorde@lemmy.dbzer0.com draw for me a picture taken at night with a trail camera with absolutely no washing machines roaming free
Here are some images matching your request
Prompt: a picture taken at night with a trail camera with absolutely no washing machines roaming free
Style: flux
Seems to have understood the negative prompt very well this time. At least AI horde did on the flux model.
CC: @Focal@pawb.social
You’re right! It did! Thanks a lot, pal! You taught me something super neat and I appreciate it!