ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Bluesky@lemmy.world · 1 year agoLooks like maybe because he's breaking checks and balances?slrpnk.netimagemessage-square33linkfedilinkarrow-up1897arrow-down16
arrow-up1891arrow-down1imageLooks like maybe because he's breaking checks and balances?slrpnk.netByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to Bluesky@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square33linkfedilink
minus-squaredisguy_ovahea@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoBeneath them, maybe. But there would certainly be no need for SCOTUS.
Beneath them, maybe. But there would certainly be no need for SCOTUS.