• Wooster@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    But car buyers’ preferences have also shifted dramatically to larger trucks and SUVs in the past 10 years or so, and even more towards high-tech and comfort amenities in the form of cameras, sensors, radars and large infotainment screens," he said.

    You can’t buy a smaller truck because the manufacturers lobbied that large trucks are exempt from stricter emissions and thus they don’t have to engineer a smaller, more efficient truck.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      And you can’t buy a new car without those high tech things. And also this shit isn’t “high tech” anymore. Large screens are dirt cheap. Aftermarket rear view cameras are going out to eat money. Idk about radar and sensors but as technology matures and becomes cheap it finds its way into every car. A budget car should be nicer now than 20 years ago because nice things have been around longer.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Are the smaller trucks like the Maverick not available in your area? Or do you mean something like a Kei truck maybe

      • tburkhol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        A 2024 Maverick has a wheelbase of 120" and curb weight of 3600 pounds. In 1991, Ford’s compact pickup, the Ranger, had a wheelbase of just 108" and curb weight of 2800 pounds. “Small” trucks have gained a foot and half a ton. The Ranger itself is now a 5000 pound behemoth that outweighs the 1990 F-150 by 1000 pounds.

      • CADmonkey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I have this weird little vehicle from the 1980’s. I can best describe it as a Japanese Jeep. It wasn’t ever a “big” vehicle, but seeing it next to a modern truck is jarring.

        The best part is, I know from direct repeated personal experience that the 60 horsepower 4wd can go more places than a typical 4wd truck.

        EDIT: Also, the truck in this picture is a 2004-2008, a 2023 is even bigger…

  • RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    That which is unsustainable will tend not to be sustained.

    $80,000 pickups exist because of farmers’ welfare checks.

    There is no real reason for vehicles to cost that much.

    • esc27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I’m confused. Are farmers the ones buying oversized trucks just to drop of the kids and shop at Walmart.

      • limelight79@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        No, farmers are buying them to do work. His point is that they couldn’t afford them if there weren’t huge subsidies for farmers. If those subsidies didn’t exist, farmers would still need pickups, so the manufacturers would almost have to come up with cheaper models, or they’d lose sales to companies that do.

        • bluewing@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I know it’s edgy and popular to blame farmers for a large number of things. But there aren’t enough farmers to buy that many pickup trucks to sustain the sheer number of of them produced.

          Look inward young urbane urbanite.