Xatolos@reddthat.com to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前Germany has too many solar panels, and it's pushed energy prices into negative territorymarkets.businessinsider.comexternal-linkmessage-square199fedilinkarrow-up1515arrow-down143cross-posted to: green@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1472arrow-down1external-linkGermany has too many solar panels, and it's pushed energy prices into negative territorymarkets.businessinsider.comXatolos@reddthat.com to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 个月前message-square199fedilinkcross-posted to: green@lemmy.ml
minus-square3volver@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·5 个月前 Do you mean that energy having no cost would mean that the electricity generated can be used to make algae? Yes. Make algae with energy that produces no carbon dioxide = carbon sink.
minus-squareSpongyAneurism@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·5 个月前There’s just no economic incentive to do so. (yet?)
minus-squareKaryoplasma@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-25 个月前The economic advantage is that our grandchildren might be able to have an economy if we don’t crash and burn this place before we die.
minus-squareSpongyAneurism@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 个月前I agree. Unfortunately that is too abstract a factor for most peoples present investment decisions.
minus-squaresunbeam60@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·5 个月前Exactly! Put a real price of carbon and this will start to chance.
Yes. Make algae with energy that produces no carbon dioxide = carbon sink.
There’s just no economic incentive to do so. (yet?)
The economic advantage is that our grandchildren might be able to have an economy if we don’t crash and burn this place before we die.
I agree. Unfortunately that is too abstract a factor for most peoples present investment decisions.
Exactly! Put a real price of carbon and this will start to chance.