cm0002@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agof-stop explained with catslemmy.mlimagemessage-square16linkfedilinkarrow-up1456arrow-down17cross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1449arrow-down1imagef-stop explained with catslemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Funny@sh.itjust.works · 1 year agomessage-square16linkfedilinkcross-posted to: funny@lemmy.ml
minus-squareeinfach_orangensaft@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agosomeone care to explain to me why f1.4 is supposed to be the lowest f number jet i can buy a fresnel lens with a calculated f of 0.4?
minus-square9point6@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18·1 year agoSimple, f1.4 isn’t supposed to be the lowest
minus-squareFetus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 year agoYeah, I have normal camera lenses lower than that. From memory, the F-stop number is like a ratio between the focal length and the effective diameter of the lens.
minus-squareHiggs boson@dubvee.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year ago f1.4 is supposed to be the lowest f number Where on earth do you get that idea? Lower is more expensive, so unless youre a pro, you dont see them as often.
someone care to explain to me why f1.4 is supposed to be the lowest f number jet i can buy a fresnel lens with a calculated f of 0.4?
Simple, f1.4 isn’t supposed to be the lowest
Yeah, I have normal camera lenses lower than that. From memory, the F-stop number is like a ratio between the focal length and the effective diameter of the lens.
Where on earth do you get that idea? Lower is more expensive, so unless youre a pro, you dont see them as often.