I can tell you’re really proud of these replies, but I’m afraid they don’t actually make sense.
You were hoping to prove a logical implication (if P then Q), but you feel it was disproved since the premise didn’t happen. However, “not P” doesn’t actually prove anything about the implication.
Anyway, no one is really accomplishing anything constructive here. Good luck!
Why? I’m not the one using it to justify an argument.
deleted by creator
It’s not my job to make your point. You don’t get free labor.
deleted by creator
So you didn’t read it either? Interesting.
deleted by creator
If it’s not compelling enough for you to read it to support your position, why would I read it?
deleted by creator
I can tell you’re really proud of these replies, but I’m afraid they don’t actually make sense.
You were hoping to prove a logical implication (if P then Q), but you feel it was disproved since the premise didn’t happen. However, “not P” doesn’t actually prove anything about the implication.
Anyway, no one is really accomplishing anything constructive here. Good luck!