I guess I’ve always been confused by the Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Physics and the fact that it’s taken seriously. Like is there any proof at all that universes outside of our own exist?

I admit that I might be dumb, but, how does one look at atoms and say “My God! There must be many worlds than just our one?”

I just never understood how Many Worlds Interpretation was valid, with my, admittedly limited understanding, it just seemed to be a wild guess no more strange than a lot things we consider too outlandish to humor.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.mlEnglish
      12·
      7 months ago

      So here’s where I think we’re getting tripped up. You’re talking as though detecting this radiation would have falsified Many Worlds; I still think it would not. It would have created an explanatory burden on proponents of MWI, to explain where this radiation is coming from if not wave function collapse. These experiments wouldn’t have been able to prove that the collapse was causing any kind of radiation emission; only that radiation emission was concurrent with it. We could conclude the collapse was the source only if all other sources were ruled out as possibilities.

      Ok, well now you’ve basically argued that falsification in general is impossible, for anything. Just like geocentrists could always add more epicycles to explain the motion of the stars, any theory can add more post-hoc explanations for any observations. This isn’t a standard you would apply to anything else, so I don’t know why you’re applying to MWI.

      The parameters of the emitted radiation - particle or wave type, energy level, charge, spin, colour, direction of travel, everything - would be different for every collapse

      No they wouldn’t, the laws of physics still apply

      “objective” in “objective collapse” at face value

      And why shouldn’t I?

      No experiment has been performed that has detected this radiation being emitted, but if it had, it still wouldn’t have falsified MWI.

      Yes, but by your standard, nothing can ever be falsified.

      I’m quite sure there’s no experiment

      You asserting it doesn’t make it true.

      From within each world: Observers see exactly what CSL predicts - apparent spontaneous wave function collapse accompanied by radiation emission (or not, in this case). The collapse looks completely real and objective to the observers, and there is no experimental way to show otherwise.

      Except there is no radiation emission unless the wave-function objectively collapses. That’s the point.

      Both frameworks ultimately make identical (observable) predictions from within each world

      No, they don’t. One predicts spontaneous radiation release, and one doesn’t.

      you had a way to definitively show from within this world that MWI’s other worlds don’t actually exist, then it’d be falsifiable.

      literally asking to prove a negative.