This bit resonated.

It makes me so terribly sad that in a society such as ours the wealthy keep creating new means to harm the less lucky.

That aside, Alan Kholer has also opined in the past that our economics policy is based on disdain.

I know many will read my financial experiences and see failure. I haven’t failed; I succeeded when the odds were totally stacked against me. I made good what life threw at me. I survived … with my values intact.

I can only agree.

  • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I guarantee that every millionaire has more outgoing expenses without counting anything spent on their children than a large family does.

    • Ilandar@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      The woman in the article is clearly not a millionaire. so I’m not sure what your point is here.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        You were scorning the mother for “wasting” money on having kids, but millionaires “waste” more money on their expenditure than having kids would do.

        Also, having 7 kids does not mean you can’t be a millionaire, as millionaires are statistically actually more likely to have more kids than average.

        Hatred of large families is largely manufactured by the media residue of hating on “Octomum” - a woman who had octuplets during the global recession of 2007-8 as a way of blaming the common folk for not having good sense (despite the fact it was a result of pure chance) and not because banks couldn’t stop themselves from doing multiple crimes every single day.

        Finally, Elon Musk has 11 kids.

        • Ilandar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Again, what is your point here? I was not “scorning the mother for wasting money on having kids”; I was mocking her inability to see her life choices as directly impacting her ability to obtain wealth. She claims “money is about luck, nothing else” but acknowledges herself that her decisions have affected her financial situation:

          I have seven children: two adults and five kids. We are a sole-income family. My children live with disability and my partner had to leave the workforce to provide full-time care for our kids. …because of my experience with poverty, having kids early, and with HECS debt, I’ve never had the opportunity to save.

          Whether incredibly wealthy people have multiple kids has no relevance to whether having any children, let alone 7, impacts your financial situation.

            • Ilandar@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              You can’t have a disabled child without first choosing to have a child.

              No birth control is 100% effective.

              Are you really pretending this woman accidentally found herself pregnant on 7 occasions? And that on each occasion, she accidentally had the child without ever making a choice to keep it instead of pursuing an abortion? And that nowhere, throughout any of these 7 births, was she ever in control of her life to the extent that she could have made choices that led her down an entirely different path?

              • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                why is having kids wasting money, but a medical procedure such as abortion not a waste of money? what value is generated from the abortion?

                • 𝚝𝚛𝚔@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I feel like you’re arguing for the sake of arguing. Nothing you’re saying makes sense beyond being contrite.

                  • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    5 months ago

                    no I’m arguing against the eugenics-based thought-terminating cliche that “poor people are poor because they have children” which is a nonsense.

                • Ilandar@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Firstly, I have never said children are a “waste” of money, I have only said that raising them impacts one’s financial situation.

                  As for how the two are different: an abortion is a standalone cost. A child is an ongoing cost lasting at least 18 years, quite possibly much longer if one aspires to be a supportive parent.