• Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Not everyone wants to own and not everyone that doesn’t want to own wants to rent an apartment and it’s not the government’s place to own single family houses for rent (all provincial governments should have a non profit crown corporation owning all rental properties over a certain number of doors though).

    Edit: Downvote all you want, I know tons of people that don’t want to have to deal with the maintenance responsibilities that come with a house, they still have a family and don’t want to live in an apartment, would you rather force them to own the place they live in?

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      it’s not the government’s place to own single family houses for rent

      all provincial governments should have a non profit crown corporation owning all rental properties over a certain number of doors though

      Why the arbitrary distinction? What’s so special about the number 1 here?

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        The level of maintenance per unit and the density issues caused by single family housing means they’re a luxury item and not a necessity, the government should be there to make sure everyone has acceptable living conditions (a private bedroom for everyone, a kitchen, bathroom and livingroom per household…) not to provide them enough space to have a home theater room or a bedroom used as a walk-in.