minnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Philosophy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 days agoNoam Chomsky, 95, ‘no longer able to talk’ as intellectual’s ‘health deteriorates’www.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1435arrow-down18cross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up1427arrow-down1external-linkNoam Chomsky, 95, ‘no longer able to talk’ as intellectual’s ‘health deteriorates’www.independent.co.ukminnix@lemux.minnix.dev to Philosophy@lemmy.worldEnglish · 22 days agomessage-square78fedilinkcross-posted to: hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squarepostmateDumbass@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down2·21 days agoYour position is: We don’t know what it is, but AI certainly won’t have it? Does not seem rigorous.
minus-squareSweetpeaches69@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down2·edit-221 days agoLol. Lmao even. Imagine thinking so rigidly. Plenty of things were known of before it was known how exactly they work. My position is: We know something is causing this, but our understanding of it is currently infantile.
Your position is:
We don’t know what it is, but AI certainly won’t have it?
Does not seem rigorous.
Lol. Lmao even.
Imagine thinking so rigidly. Plenty of things were known of before it was known how exactly they work. My position is:
We know something is causing this, but our understanding of it is currently infantile.
QED