• Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why would they be driving on a road fully regulated by a separate country without some sort of agreement?

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Well, see, there’s this multi-million dollar trust that gets registered in their NAME at birth by the gubmint, so now everything is free.

      • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        But why would the gubmint register a trust with a sovereign country without a sort of agreement?

  • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I can actually understand this one to an extent. A driver’s license and vehicle registration are only required to drive on public roads, not legal requirements for having a car. That said, taking a car onto a public road without the aforementioned is illegal and should result in a fine.

    • RandomLegend [He/Him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Driving an unregistered vehicle without any license on a public road is endangering others. So a fine would not be sufficient.

      It’s the same arguing as carrying an unregistered weapon without a license in public space. That would be confiscated as well instead of being fined.