• Bye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can we do mandatory civil service instead

    Like that would actually help people, building infrastructure, national parks, gaining skills and trades, maybe helping reduce obesity

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      5 months ago

      For real. Could make it either. Give people buy in so they care aboutour country and communities. Be proud of our currently decrepit infrastructure.

      And for the love of… country, do not allow religious exceptions.

    • AllYourSmurf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      This is a great idea. How about this: After high school, you do 2 years of civil service. Then you go to college for free. After that, you do 2-4 more years of civil service, depending on how much school you do.

      In the first 2 years, you grow up a bit, experience the real world, and earn a paycheck.

      Next you go to college. Get a good liberal arts core and a major in your area of interest. Then spend a couple of years putting that learning to use and developing your skills.

      • FlaminGoku@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well thought out and makes a ton of sense. It would also instill empathetic patriotism where you love your country because you helped make it.

    • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I always said this is the answer for offering free education. Get a job after you’re done with school and then get a few years of real world experience. Then companies get people with training and experience right out the gate

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        In theory it’s up to 5 year imprisonment and 250,000 for failing to show. Dodgers must have some way around such. (Also a felony charge, the kind he can pardon if president)

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Dodging generally means disclosing a previous medical condition, or otherwise absconding from the draft. In either case, you would not be “fit to serve” as they call it.

  • MagicShel@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I joined the army for no reason other than I didn’t know what the fuck to do with myself. Hell I could’ve had a free ride to college if I’d known what I wanted to do.

    So it is from the perspective of experience that I will tell you, the quality of our military will plummet when absolutely no one gives a fuck about being there. There were gung ho motherfuckers who really wanted to be in the army and they were good soldiers. Then there were those of us who were just there to fuck off. You don’t want 100x as many of those. The military would just be absolute garbage.

    • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think this is the point, as much as it is indoctrination.

      It will have two effects, one of which is to water down the efficacy of the US military with a bunch of disaffected conscripts and the other to attempt a capture of the “activist” years for what will be the dominant post-Boomer voting block. It is to stamp out some of the more extreme progressive tendencies, like “let’s try not suck hot shit on everything from climate to racial equality to gender equality to economic inequality.”

  • Kalkaline @leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 months ago

    The ONLY way I’d accept this is if it applied across the board to the rich and political elites. It won’t, so I’m definitely not going to vote for Trump.

    • The Pantser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      5 months ago

      Also women, I am glad the removed the selective service requirement for males to apply for FAFSA but equal rights means equal requirements for those rights.

      • ArtieShaw@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’d be !00% on board with including women in the draft. Fair is fair.

        Personally - like I told the recruiter from Annapolis 30 years ago, “trust me when I say that you don’t want me anywhere near your military.” If I were drafted I think I could fail out of basic on my own lack of merit.

        If there were other service options, I could happily do other work. For example: Math, science, or language tutoring for teens. I could have helped out a kid who actually wanted to get into Annapolis but didn’t have strong enough academics.

  • seaQueue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    Time to buy stock in ozempic and metformin manufacturers I guess. IIRC the average enlistment age American needs something like 6-12wk of pre-bootcamp to be in shape enough to handle bootcamp, and the military is handing metformin out like candy.

    • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Seriously. I finished OSUT for 11B school and half the company didn’t pass the tape test and that was in 2002. There’s no fucking way its not so much worse now.

    • HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Most people in the armed forces never even shoot in the direction of a person, let alone kill.

      I would hope to see something like 6 months basic - armed forces plus health, basic education, fitness, key life skills like how to swim. 6 months trade learning basic engineering, electronics, first aid, computer skills, followed by 12 months in standby for manpower - disaster relief, infrastructure, yes also deployments.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Don’t forget the walls. And then those to build the towers that will have to shoot down the drug drops that will still fly over in drones if it were cement like the great wall. Oh, and those checking for tunnels. As our expenses go up and up as we start having people constantly hunting for tunnels and our population declining and taxes be reduced on the rich… What happens to the country?

        All of this avoided by legalizing and taxing the drugs, growing them here. Easier to regulate, and it cuts the funding to the cartels allowing Mexico to stabilize better and slowly maybe south America if we partner with them on manufacturing. Inflation stabilizes there, a lot more places to live safely. Reducing immigration, while keeping immigrants coming at rates that we can set with updated policy. (That part requires the legislative branch to do their job)… actually all of it requires the legislative branch to do their job. Set age and term limits… Scrub the rust off.