lumpenproletariat@quokk.auM to PhilosophyMemes@quokk.auEnglish · 9 个月前this seems relativequokk.auimagemessage-square87linkfedilinkarrow-up1182arrow-down11
arrow-up1181arrow-down1imagethis seems relativequokk.aulumpenproletariat@quokk.auM to PhilosophyMemes@quokk.auEnglish · 9 个月前message-square87linkfedilink
minus-squareHasturInYellow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 个月前I know you’re taking a piss, but why would forcing all things to be the same be necessarily moral?
minus-squareBrainsploosh@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 个月前When arguing for a universal intent, it’s typically argued as virtuous/moral to further that intent, or at least immoral to go against that intent. The conclusions are bunk because the premise is bunk.
minus-squareHasturInYellow@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 个月前Ah. I suppose that makes some sense but yeah the whole premise of universal intent is just silly.
I know you’re taking a piss, but why would forcing all things to be the same be necessarily moral?
When arguing for a universal intent, it’s typically argued as virtuous/moral to further that intent, or at least immoral to go against that intent.
The conclusions are bunk because the premise is bunk.
Ah. I suppose that makes some sense but yeah the whole premise of universal intent is just silly.