• Susaga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    God, I hate this argument. “It’s not bad because it might be good someday.” This isn’t the first technology to have this argument applied to it, and it won’t be the last. But even if it could be good some hypothetical day, it’s still bad now.

    There is no good AI usage because any creator good enough to make it good would not give the fun task of creation to an AI. The only people who like AI enough to use it aren’t creators, so it’s ALL bad AI usage.

    • bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I agree with you. However, I was more stating you wont even know the difference in about 5 ish years. Even now, if i play you 6 songs with 1 of them being ai generated, almost a guarantee 99% of people cant tell which one it is (as a musician, this is sad, but music as a whole has been going downhill for many years anyways).

      Even games youre playing right now, you have no clue if it was vibe coded or not. People will simply lie, and there will be no way to actually prove it either.

      The only way at all to avoid it is only buy media from very trusted creators. So that would basically leave out every large developer.

      • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        You very obviously don’t agree with me. Do you know how long people have been saying “you can’t tell the difference”? Gonna be honest, if you can’t tell it’s AI music, maybe you just don’t have a good ear for music. I can tell. 99% is just a lie, because if it was actually identical, then you’d guess right 1 in 6 times.

        If I have to discard every large developer to avoid AI, then nothing of value is lost.