Need to make a primal scream without gathering footnotes first? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid: Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh facts of Awful youā€™ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutā€™nā€™paste it into its own post ā€” thereā€™s no quota for posting and the bar really isnā€™t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned soo many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but thereā€™s no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iā€™m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. Iā€™m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyā€™re inescapable at this point, yet I donā€™t see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnā€™t be surgeons because they didnā€™t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canā€™t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

  • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    Ā·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Microsoftā€™s AI leader claimed that copyright on the internet can be ignored: https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/ever-put-content-on-the-web-microsoft-says-that-its-okay-for-them-to-steal-it-because-its-freeware

    With respect to content that is already on the open web, the social contract of that content since the 90s has been that it is fair use. Anyone can copy it, recreate with it, reproduce with it. That has been freeware, if you like. Thatā€™s been the understanding, thereā€™s a separate category where a website or a publisher or a news organization had explicitly said, ā€˜do not scrape or crawl me for any other reason than indexing me so that other people can find that content.ā€™ Thatā€™s a gray area and I think thatā€™s going to work its way through the courts.

    Watch the entire interview if youā€™re bored because he is in deep. Microsoft probably just hired the most AI-enthused person they could find.

    • Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      I think even wilder is that he thinks content which has explicitly been labeled ā€œdo not scrape except for search engine indexingā€ is a ā€œgray areaā€ with regards to scraping for AI. Like, thatā€™s exactly what it says not to do!

    • Soyweiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      He isnā€™t totally wrong re the unspoken rule, but he forgets the second unspoken rule, that the first rule only applies to human being doing entertainment not corporations trying to make money.

    • 200fifty@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      Anyone can copy it, recreate with it, reproduce with it

      Ewā€¦ stay away from my content, you creep!

    • o7___o7@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      Ā·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Never thought Iā€™d see Microsoft suggest downloading a car, but I should have seen it coming.

    • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      Ā·
      4 months ago

      Hereā€™s the whole thing from that great quote. Sorkin is not a hard-hitting interviewer, but he just asks the incredibly obvious questions and Suleyman swerves and dodges like a MF while pronouncing at him in an English listen-to-me-you-pleb voice.