• Don Piano@feddit.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s actually really there in the sense that the grass the goose is standing on is very green and reflected off their chin! :)

    I wondered the same for a second when I went through the pictures at home.

    • KevinFRK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Thanks. What’s worse, is that I lost quite a few attempts to this problem today: white gulls and the like, against dark backgrounds. Trying to remove over-exposure just leaves a vivid green discolouration,

      • Don Piano@feddit.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Huh, interesting. I wonder where the difference is coming from. You use a Canon, right? Maybe that plays a role? But surely that would be more an issue of raw data interpretation… Do you have any examples easily on hand?

        I don’t think it’d be an issue of sea birds, would it? Blue seas would tint things blue and, if (over-)corrected, orange, I’d assume…

        • KevinFRK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It is indeed a Canon, and using Canon’s DPP4 to correct the over-exposed whites using the RAW format of pictures. I really ought to research it properly, but I’m guessing that different colours (YGB) are reaching over-exposed to different degrees and getting capped. E.g. Blue is very over-exposed, Yellow is a bit over-exposed and Green is only barely over-exposed. Then when I try to bring them back to properly exposed “as one” with the histogram tool or brigtness slider, those caps and degrees are getting messed up, giving a colour balance in a manner that doesn’t reflect the original and I get a green tinge.

          That, or pay more attention to whites in frame!