lumpenproletariat@quokk.au to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 month agowanna be a cop_quokk.auexternal-linkmessage-square40linkfedilinkarrow-up1654arrow-down17 cross-posted to: seattle@lemmy.world
arrow-up1647arrow-down1external-linkwanna be a cop_quokk.aulumpenproletariat@quokk.au to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square40linkfedilink cross-posted to: seattle@lemmy.world
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-21 month agoIt’s not a formal context, it’s very obviously written in a breezy and casual style, where attention-grabbing is more important than formalities The call-response format is short-long in stressing, which gives it a PUNCH that “fewer” would lose as well 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Feels more punchy than 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Also, it’s not a recruitment poster, it’s a political advocacy poster.
minus-squareRug_Pisser@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoAgain I disagree with your assessment and assertions.
minus-squaregwl [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 month agoAh yeah, I always use “wanna” in formal context, like all the time
It’s not a formal context, it’s very obviously written in a breezy and casual style, where attention-grabbing is more important than formalities
The call-response format is short-long in stressing, which gives it a PUNCH that “fewer” would lose as well
Feels more punchy than
Also, it’s not a recruitment poster, it’s a political advocacy poster.
Again I disagree with your assessment and assertions.
Ah yeah, I always use “wanna” in formal context, like all the time