• AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      That would be so if Agent Krasnov hadn’t squandered NATO’s defensive weapons on a stock manipulation scheme in the Hormuz Strait. Russia could bombard Berlin or Brussels with ballistic missiles (of which it has a growing surplus) in the same way it is bombarding Kyiv, as there are no more Patriot interceptors and won’t be.

      • Kissaki@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 days ago

        While the ballistic missiles certainly damage Kyiv and its people, they haven’t pushed them into surrender. I don’t see how spreading out the ballistic missiles Russia has to more countries, who will then join the war more actively, would help them.

      • Tiefkuehlkost@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        You know what Germany did with the Blitz in London in WW2 ? It didnt bring Britain to surrender. Kyiv also does not surrender.

        Non Atomic Air Bombardments cause damage but they dont win wars in most cases. Why would they here ?