Just like 16 years old people can’t vote because too young, 80+ years old people should not be able to vote, most of them are too distant from everyday reality of younger people to be able to take a wise decision for the community and also often stick with (way too) old ideals from their years

  • Axolotl@feddit.itOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    A competency test is just the start of the end of a democracy tbh, it means that someone can influence political decisions by making a specific political idea “incompetent”

    Both age and competency limitations are very stupid ideas

    • wraekscadu@vargar.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      A competency test is just the start of the end of a democracy tbh,

      Not inherently

      someone can influence political decisions by making a specific political idea “incompetent”

      Correct, which is the biggest issue and why it’s very dangerous to implement in practice.

      That being said, there is nothing inherently wrong with competency tests. We have competency tests for driving, practicing medicine, law and so on. Why? Because we don’t want incompetent individuals with the power to cause a lot of damage.

      Through voting, millions can be stripped off health coverage. Wars can be started. The power to vote can create or destroy entire civilizations.

      A basic competency test for:

      • ensuring that the voter understands the structure of governance
      • can identify logical fallacies
      • can identify cognitive biases

      would help reduce the probability of disaster imo.

      The question of “the test setter can act in bad faith” can be remedied through independent sortition based committees requiring a supermajority approval for the test. I mean I can’t see how designing such a structure in theory could be that difficult.