• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nobody is forcing him to be a member of the profession – to paraphrase one of his tweets that was complained about “You’re free to leave [the profession] at any point.”

    Jordan Peterson really is free to leave the profession - he doesn’t need the money. Meanwhile a psychologist who isn’t independently wealthy can’t express controversial opinions without risking his livelihood. I don’t think “only the rich can exercise freedom of speech” is good policy.

    • ttmrichter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      And again people don’t grok what “freedom of speech” entails.

      You can speak all you like. If what you say pisses people off, they can avoid you all they like, up to and including MOTHERFUCKING EMPLOYMENT.

      Freeze Peach idiots need to grow the Hell up!

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        People forget that free speech also includes freedom of association. You can say what you want but others have the freedom to choose not to associate with you because of it.

    • mrbubblesort@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Meanwhile a psychologist who isn’t independently wealthy can’t express controversial opinions without risking his livelihood

      Oh fuck off with that. The opinion he expressed was, and I quote, (about child deaths) “it’s just poor children, and the world has too many people on it anyways”. A licensed medical professional should never say something like that, period, even in jest.

      • AdmiralShat@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Copy and paste of another user’s comment:

        Good article?

        The comments that formed the basis of the complaints against Dr. Peterson included comments on a podcast in which he commented on air pollution and child deaths by saying “it’s just poor children…”

        This quote is the most disgusting out of context character assassination I’ve seen in a long time.

        I got suspicious because while Jordan does say things that women and/or trans people often find deplorable. I know that he’s a strong supporter of the poor (at least in rhetoric) and as a family man I assume of children as well.

        The full context can be found on Spotify. Episode #1769 of “The Joe Rogan Experience” start from about 15:30. He’s the one that brings up how 7 million poor children die from indoor particulate pollution. Joe doesn’t believe him and gets a fact check, which eventually leads to Jordan sarcastically saying “Well, it’s just poor children, and the world has too many people on it anyway…”

        It’s such an insane mischaracterization of what he said, you can’t take the article seriously. Probably would have to write off the entire website that article is from, honestly.

        • sushimi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Thanks for clearing that up💯. it indeed is not Jordan’s character to say something negative about the worth of any person. i can only immagine that he would say something like that when he’s deliberately portraying the perspective of an evil mentality.

          i don’t get why you get 19 downvotes though…