The_Hideous_Orgalorg@sh.itjust.works to Autism@lemmy.world · 20 days agoOn rulesimagemessage-square221linkfedilinkarrow-up1958arrow-down153
arrow-up1905arrow-down1imageOn rulesThe_Hideous_Orgalorg@sh.itjust.works to Autism@lemmy.world · 20 days agomessage-square221linkfedilink
minus-squareStrider@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·19 days agoHow to even ‘middle ground’? Either follow a rule or not, there is no middle ground.
minus-squareAnon7394@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-218 days agoEasy. Follow the rule when it makes sense, not follow it when it doesn’t.
minus-squareStrider@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·18 days agoThere are so many fields where that does not work, for example in the car. If I cannot rely on the behavior of others it’s unsafe and everyone is unsatisfied.
minus-squareAnon7394@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·15 days agoSure it does. Example. I don’t use the blinker deep in my own property. I use it when on public roads.
minus-squareStrider@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·15 days agoAnd yet, it’s about training and conditioning. The chance that you’ll skip it is higher than with someone who never does. I know I’m nitpicking but it’s technically correct.
How to even ‘middle ground’?
Either follow a rule or not, there is no middle ground.
Easy. Follow the rule when it makes sense, not follow it when it doesn’t.
There are so many fields where that does not work, for example in the car. If I cannot rely on the behavior of others it’s unsafe and everyone is unsatisfied.
Sure it does. Example. I don’t use the blinker deep in my own property. I use it when on public roads.
And yet, it’s about training and conditioning.
The chance that you’ll skip it is higher than with someone who never does.
I know I’m nitpicking but it’s technically correct.