It was the title generated by Lemmy itself, and it was removed for “not being news” but “an editorial”.
Even though it contains many new important facts which are complete news to most lemmings, seeing as the rape propaganda still gets repeated here daily.
Real news is apparently fast-food getting more expensive and whatever Donald Trump, Taylor Swift and Elon Musk had for breakfast yesterday.
Just to defend the modding team, the post wasn’t removed for the subject, but because it could be considered an opinion article. Not all mods agree on this point, and we are having a discussion on what should fall under rule 6. If you disagree with other posts, you should report it.
Just to entirely debunk that defense: I have reported the original fictional propaganda piece “screams without words” from the New York Times on /news and it did not get removed
Fake propaganda rape stories to manufacture consent for Genocide are allowed but articles debunking it by linking to sources from major Israeli newspapers and IDF evidence are apparently “opinion pieces”.
A two-month investigation by The Times uncovered painful new details, establishing that the attacks against women were not isolated events but part of a broader pattern of gender-based violence on Oct. 7.
Relying on video footage, photographs, GPS data from mobile phones and interviews with more than 150 people, including witnesses, medical personnel, soldiers and rape counselors, The Times identified at least seven locations where Israeli women and girls appear to have been sexually assaulted or mutilated.
You’ve been repeatedly shown to be dishonest in promoting your preferred narrative. An absurd amount of your time on here is spent desperately trying to “debunk” this single article with anything you can find. Proven propaganda articles, authors who publish for an authoritarian regime’s propaganda channels, you really don’t care where. And, no, this Intercept editorial that repeats the Mondoweiss claims but conveniently fails to mention that the family in question says they are untrue doesn’t “debunk” it either. Notably, it’s been ten days but Mondoweiss still hasn’t issued a correction or a retraction. I wonder why.
That NYT article is written by a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist (for conflict zone reporting). It’s written for a paper that routinely corrects errors. In spite of months of effort and additional reporting, there it is without a single major correction.
From /news
It was the title generated by Lemmy itself, and it was removed for “not being news” but “an editorial”.
Even though it contains many new important facts which are complete news to most lemmings, seeing as the rape propaganda still gets repeated here daily.
Real news is apparently fast-food getting more expensive and whatever Donald Trump, Taylor Swift and Elon Musk had for breakfast yesterday.
Just to defend the modding team, the post wasn’t removed for the subject, but because it could be considered an opinion article. Not all mods agree on this point, and we are having a discussion on what should fall under rule 6. If you disagree with other posts, you should report it.
Just to entirely debunk that defense: I have reported the original fictional propaganda piece “screams without words” from the New York Times on /news and it did not get removed
It is still up here
Fake propaganda rape stories to manufacture consent for Genocide are allowed but articles debunking it by linking to sources from major Israeli newspapers and IDF evidence are apparently “opinion pieces”.
Yes now go read the Intercept’s article to see every single lie you just mentioned fully debunked.
You are still repeating IDF propaganda.
You’ve been repeatedly shown to be dishonest in promoting your preferred narrative. An absurd amount of your time on here is spent desperately trying to “debunk” this single article with anything you can find. Proven propaganda articles, authors who publish for an authoritarian regime’s propaganda channels, you really don’t care where. And, no, this Intercept editorial that repeats the Mondoweiss claims but conveniently fails to mention that the family in question says they are untrue doesn’t “debunk” it either. Notably, it’s been ten days but Mondoweiss still hasn’t issued a correction or a retraction. I wonder why.
That NYT article is written by a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist (for conflict zone reporting). It’s written for a paper that routinely corrects errors. In spite of months of effort and additional reporting, there it is without a single major correction.