Look, fair. It’s a boon for the Dandenong corridor, and will have flow on effects, but we’re still just kind of patching an overall transit system rather than a proper reinvestment the whole thing needs.
But again, Melbourne airport are dealing in bad faith and should be stripped of the rights. The landlord is stuck taking lip from the person they leased the house out too, and the tenant is refusing essential works. Makes no sense.
It does “Make Sense” in the “Economic Rationalism” mindset.
They don’t want to loose money they make on Parking, Airport bus licensing and all these other little penny-pinching charges they can make in their role as the monopoly.
If they loose customers to other methods of transport like Interstate Rail/Coaches, driving and people just not travelling, that is fine because they still make obscene profits on the parking.
Look, fair. It’s a boon for the Dandenong corridor, and will have flow on effects, but we’re still just kind of patching an overall transit system rather than a proper reinvestment the whole thing needs.
But again, Melbourne airport are dealing in bad faith and should be stripped of the rights. The landlord is stuck taking lip from the person they leased the house out too, and the tenant is refusing essential works. Makes no sense.
It does “Make Sense” in the “Economic Rationalism” mindset.
They don’t want to loose money they make on Parking, Airport bus licensing and all these other little penny-pinching charges they can make in their role as the monopoly.
If they loose customers to other methods of transport like Interstate Rail/Coaches, driving and people just not travelling, that is fine because they still make obscene profits on the parking.