RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.world · 8 months agoRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square19fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10cross-posted to: finance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkRichest 1% account for more carbon emissions than poorest 66%, report sayswww.theguardian.comRandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square19fedilinkcross-posted to: finance@beehaw.orgeconomics@lemmy.ml
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 months ago eat better organic food A slight nit-pick here, but when it comes to greenhouse gas impact, organic food may be worse. It’s certainly not clearly better.
minus-squareCraigeryTheKid@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·8 months agoYeah I’ve overheard that before too. If they would just change their words to “eat less meat” they’re be right, but to only say “organic” implies standard agriculture is worse, and it is not clearly so. We should eat less meat though.
minus-squareAux@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·8 months agoWe sholdn’t eat less meat, meat is pretty much zero emission and closed loop food production. We should more.
A slight nit-pick here, but when it comes to greenhouse gas impact, organic food may be worse. It’s certainly not clearly better.
Yeah I’ve overheard that before too. If they would just change their words to “eat less meat” they’re be right, but to only say “organic” implies standard agriculture is worse, and it is not clearly so.
We should eat less meat though.
We sholdn’t eat less meat, meat is pretty much zero emission and closed loop food production. We should more.