• ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A lot of that is warmer or equal to Edmonton

    We could settle a lot more but it deflates housing values and takes money/business away from the places that are settled

    • inbeesee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wait, so are there regs or something preventing more housing development? I thought this was a joke about it being obviously too cold up there.

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        There are zoning issues but the infrastructure is done by the government or in this case not done

        In Northern Ontario the infrastructure is struggling as is because the current premier took the money from the maintenance budget and put it into Toronto ahead of the last election to try to get more votes

        Ontario went to municipalities around Toronto and told them they need to add x number of houses but never touched the north

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          If an elected something can spend money to get elected again by pleasing most people for that expenditure, they’ll spend on most densely populated areas, as density improves efficiency.

          This is where electoral college (or other non-linear representation) stops looking bad.