• Zagorath@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you haven’t already, take a look at Dave Wiskus’s response to it on Reddit, posted elsewhere in the comments.

    • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thanks for pointing that out. I’d missed the last line on my first read of it somehow.

      Additionally, 1/3 of the revenue from any subscriber is allocated to the creator responsible for bringing in that subscriber.

      This reads to me like this is the purpose of going to a creator specific link when initially signing up. For example, if you go to nebula.tv and sign up from their main page, no specific creator gets that 33% cut of your revenue. Alternatively, if you see a YouTube video where a creator talks about their content also being on Nebula, they ask you not to go to the platforms main page, but specifically to nebula.tv/zagorath to sign up. If I went to that link and signed up, you would get 33% of my subscription revenue.

      To me, this opens another question of what is this the term of this 33% cut. I doubt it’s a cut of the revenue for so long as my subscription is active. I’d imagine it’s more likely a cut of whatever the initial payment is, be it a single month’s subscription fee or a full year.

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah that’s a good question. I’m honestly not sure. I bought a lifetime subscription about a year ago so that woulda given Jason Slaughter a fucktonne, compared to paying month-by-month, if it’s only the first payment.

        That would explain why they provide such a strong incentive to pay yearly (since it’s much cheaper than monthly). It’s also interesting that you get a much cheaper price if you go through a creator’s code rather than heading straight to nebula.tv.