• ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    enables a lot of ordinary people to create art.

    Exactly the type of fucking idiot that’s never created art in their life.
    “Art is paintings of horses”-ass motherfucker.
    The reason you can’t make art isn’t because you’re bad at drawing or painting and need AI to help you, it’s because you don’t have the creativity to overcome those limitations. No matter what words you put into stable diffusion, you will only create pictures, not art - there’s no meaning underlying the piece, you just typed “t-rex with massive tits” and called the output art because you can’t tell the difference.

    • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Well, people like what comes out of Stable Diffusion. Which is perfectly fine.

      This is like the pizza shop complaining that I’m cooking at home.

      • yoink [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        its more like the pizza shop calling you out when you’re cooking frozen pizza and calling yourself a chef

        all power to you if you want to just consume slop, but dont complain when you turn around years later and the quality of everything across the board has gone even further to shit cos you were so happy you could type in words and see anything you wanted for all the 15 minutes of dopamine it gave you

        • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Artist incomes are threatened by the rise of Generative models. Especially mediocre artists who Stable Diffusion have already surpassed.

          Technology changes the world and obsoletes some professions. It has been like this for ever. Artists are not any different.

          • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            How will AI take over creative professions when it can’t even perform rote professions? AI chatbots keep going rogue and lying to customers about company policies (and even the actual law), image generators can’t get enough of illegal and violent imagery, facial recognition AI’s keep identifying black people as all looking the same - in art the value of a peice is constrained by the meaning it has to people, so why do you think that LLMs and all the other predictive generators we laughably call intelligent will be able to create meaningful peices by putting together the most likely set of pixels?

              • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                I didn’t ask when, I asked how. How is a prediction engine, that is something that guesses a likely output based on past information, going to display creativity?

                • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  The results speak for themselves. There is amazing AI generated content out there.

                  • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    I don’t fucking care if it’s on the moon, answer my question: by what mechanism will a machine learning model exhibit creativity? Like you understand my question, right - you know how “AI” works?