• David Gerard@awful.systems
    shield
    OPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    note: tech sociopath apologists in this thread will be removed and banned for everyone’s best interests

    edit: or just acting like a pointless dipshit. jfc you people

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      but why is mr wonka so easily offended? all I did was feed myself into the machine that makes chocolate chips but he called me a stupid motherfucker while his staff sang a jaunty tune

    • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Can I ask a sincere question? whats a tech sociopath apologist, could you demonstrate an example?

      Again, im sincerely genuinely asking

      • froztbyte@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Someone who takes it on themselves to act as apologist for the words/actions of tech sociopaths

        Often seen as “weird nerds coming to defense of $x” (such as musk, or in this case the kagi dudebro)

        • froztbyte@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          (And then I glanced at your post history and noticed a trend of JAQing off so I now doubt whether you’re sincere in asking)

            • Crazazy [hey hi! :D]@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              Short for Just Asking Questions. Where people ask loaded questions that act as a veneer to their actual statements. If you want to accuse them of the fact they are talking shit, they’ll say they’re “just skeptical” and “asking questions”

  • noride@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’d say he’s a milquetoast narcissist at best, his boilerplate deflectons were totally hinged the whole time.

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah this is a big overreaction to someone defending their life’s work. I see nothing wrong here. The writer’s immediate and thorough disinterest in discussion doesn’t make the owner wrong to explain, and to call it mansplaining when you say you won’t even read it?

      Not that the explanations are necessarily satisfactory, but he’s not a villain merely for trying to explain.

        • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I think a lot of folks, in my experience especially those who didn’t grow up with the Internet, don’t see online interactions as “real” as offline. I think it explains a lot of the harassing behavior we see online.

          For the peanut gallery, if someone asks you to stop communicating with you but you persist, it’s harassment regardless of the venue.

          • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’d like to think so, but I think you’re being unduly generous here and actually they’re just entitled shitheads

    • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      running through the sales playbook big time over a post with no readers

      and now the original blog post, which had almost no readers, is front page on HN as I write this, and (in between the sociopath apologetics) even the horrible nerds are noticing he’s bizarre on privacy, GDPR and AI obsession …

  • Jayjader@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Copy-pasting the alt-text from one of the screenshots because I can’t be assed to type it out myself:

    Discord convo from 07/15/22, Vlad: people who really need anonymity are very rare. Probably less than a 100 in the entire world. Definitely not typical Kagi users. Unless they are criminals, in which case we don’t care they don’t have full anonymity (nor we want them as customers)

    yikes, double yikes and triple yikes.

    I guess he doesn’t care to help women find a safe way to have an abortion in 14 out of 50 US states (source), for starters. Nor to help the doubtlessly more-than-100 queer folk in places that outlaw homosexuality.

    Or maybe he’s such a genius that he knows how to keep them safe without actually keeping them anonymous - and in that case, he should start selling such a technique as its own product /s

    • self@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I want vlad to list his criteria for who makes that list of 100 people, cause something tells me it’s all oligarchs and other powerful and monied people, and absolutely nobody whose life or livelihood is directly threatened by an information leak

    • gerikson@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m in a forum where some person claims that the sealion is actually the reasonable one.

      It’s proof to me that this throwaway comic is such a good summary for certain online behavior that there’s an entire subculture built around trying to subvert it.

      (also Wondermark is great in general)

  • Steve@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I swear I knew these fuckers were dodgy when I saw how UX designed their website was. A better search engine would sell itself even if it looked like craigslist.

  • slopjockey@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    they did in fact reach at least 20,000 users, and to celebrate they set up a business entity in Germany (they are currently US based), in order to start a tiny little t-shirt printing company. And their goal was to print 20,000 t-shirts to give out, FOR FREE, to their first 20,000 users (with users paying only shipping costs). But I cannot stress enough, they did not just spend money on 20,000 tshirts to give out, they set up a whole new business entity in Germany to run their own t-shirt printing operation, with its own building and warehouse and employee(s? I get the sense it’s one guy but I don’t know). And this cost them 1/3 of their $670k funding round. One, fucking, third. For t-shirts. Did I mention that the t-shirts don’t even have the Kagi name on them? Just the Kagi dog mascot

    0% interest rate behavior

  • V0ldek@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I literally learnt about Kagi like a week ago from a Cory Doctorow’s post. I was like oh, cool, someone there to fight google.

    • shadow@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Ah man, same. Thought I’d give it a go after reading about if from Cory…

      Honestly, for what I search for, DDG is sufficient, and it’s not gonna hassle me about subscriptions.

      What I’d really like to find is something like a pihole for search, where you have your blocklist, cache of things you’ve searched already (your own mini search engine?), and then a fallback engine (DDG, bing, Google, whatever) for things it doesn’t already know.

      I dunno. Search and AI botshit is everywhere, and it’s gonna keep getting worse. Self-hosting tools seems to be the only way to take control back.

      • No1@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        So close!

        We were right there!

        And then Vlad had to do his impaling thing…

    • flatpandisk@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I found that while Doctorow post weird like an ad in the form of a post.

    • BlueMonday1984@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      No clue why they’d willingly accept crypto - they aren’t doing anything that’d have credit card companies running for the hills.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Eh, nothing wrong with accepting payments in crypto. Sometimes the gas fees are a lot less than what a payment provider / credit card provider would charge.

  • inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve never had anothee CEO mansplain his company to me

    🤣

    Slayed me.

    I haven’t paid Kagi much attention up to this point, so I’m coming in cold to this. But gawd Vlad (makes himself) sound like a huge dork.

  • V0ldek@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    There seems to be an incredibly large intersection between sociopathic dipshits and failure to understand the basics of GDPR.

    “Email address is not PII” is such a deep level of not getting it it’s indistinguishable from satire.

    • ebu@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      i absolutely love the “clarification” that an email address is PII only if it’s your real, primary, personal email address, and any other email address (that just so happens to be operated and used exclusively by a single person, even to the point of uniquely identifying that person by that address) is not PII

  • Sailor Sega Saturn@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Seeing how successful Kagi is when run by someone who actively sets their own money on fire for no reason almost makes me want to try and start a search engine company. I mean I couldn’t do it any worse right? And there is a market for it.

  • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Can I sincerely ask what we’re supposed to use instead?

    Kagi has given me the best search experience ive had in at least a decade, I’m not going back to the enshittification engine, and everything else is just bing in fancy wrapping paper. Is there something else like Kagi? Is there something like DDG or Searx that arent just slightly better bing?

    • David Gerard@awful.systemsOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Feel entirely free to use Kagi, just remember that it’s run by an idiot and could blow up at any moment.

      • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Apologies, my question wasn’t rhetorical, I was genuinely looking for suggestions. I don’t want to use kagi if this is who is running it… BUT all the alternatives that I’m personally aware of are not options for replacement.

      • 200fifty@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        ok but for real… it’s not great for finding actual answers to queries, but I find like 800x more interesting results with search.marginalia.nu than any other search engine. It’s the only search engine that I find actively fun to just browse around on recreationally.

        • V0ldek@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          it’s not great for finding actual answers to queries, but I find like 800x more interesting results

          Dunno if this is just poorly phrased or… Finding actual answers to queries is the only job of a search engine, what does “interesting” mean here?

          • froztbyte@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            For me instantly evoked the memory of using the internet from when I first got to access it (~92) until 2012…2014ish, years I could describe as “the party is emptying, not as big as earlier”, vs 2014…2016 which I’d describe as having definite “okay there’s only 3 people left on the dancefloor” vibes (and the downslope started being felt 2008…2009 already, but slowly, only later more pronounced).

            It was a time when you truly could just randomly browse search results and find all kinds of interesting things. It’s hard to convey, in today’s ecosystem, what that felt like. The fedi scratches a similar itch, but it feels (and I don’t mean this as criticism) more “a diamond in the muck”, a glimmer of hope in a sea of awful. A general optimism was quite prevalent among the internet of then, even despite it also having its awful aspects

            I have years of irc logs in multiple channels, filled with the shared experiences of years of people delighting and gaping and pointing at all kinds of stuff like this. And things rarely feel the same.

            I will never forgive the walled gardens for what they took from all of us, for what they destroyed

          • Amoeba_Girl@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You can use a search engine to explore the world wide web and find curious little pages made by real human beings. Google et al. and the SEO twats have made that mostly impossible without drastic measures.

  • herescunty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Not even Google ever printed 20k tshirts to give away for free.

    Thats demonstrably false. I used to work for a merch company on the Google account and 20k custom printed Google t-shirts to give away at some event is a once every one or two months kind of order.

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Ok but did they spin up their own shirt printing company in another country using one third of their investment money to print them or did they just pay a shirt printing service that already existed at a bulk discount rate?

      • herescunty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Exactly. Even Google, who have piles and piles of cash just sitting around and could easily afford it, don’t move into the printing business to save a few bucks. They just contract some company who offer that kind of thing as a service to arrange it for them. The company I worked for don’t even print the t-shirts, they just arrange the printing via a range of companies who do offer such a service. Everyone in between takes a little cut and Google still get their t-shirts at like £5 each.

        Google love a t-shirt. Sold more t-shirts to Google than any other client by a mile and a half.

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m just trying to use independent search engines with their own index/crawler. I used DDG for many years but the fact that it’s basically a front end for Bing and Microsoft started to bother me, particularly since they put ChatGPT into Bing.

    I only know of Brave Search, Mojeek, and Kagi to be independent and private at this point. I don’t want to pay for Kagi, Mojeek has its uses but I wouldn’t use it as my main engine, so that left Brave Search. The company and CEO is sus, I don’t use their chromium browser, and their search results seem to emulate and optimize ranking based on the big guys (Google and Bing) but in 2024 search is hard to come by and it’s more important to me to be fully independent of big tech.

    • Mojeek@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      are you able to let us know what you use Mojeek for? Just interested in where we slot in

      • archchan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Tldr: I like your ranking algo. Feels like a breath of fresh air reminiscent of the old days of search and internet

        Long version: When I want to get results for a query, not for an intent per se, I use Mojeek.

        It works best for certain types of queries. When I want to get out of the commercialized, centralized, sanitized, SEO-ridden bubble that is every other search engine, Mojeek let’s me find way more potentially obscure, unique, and satisfying results per query that likely wouldn’t rank favorably with the modern page quality criteria used by Google. Plus, compared to the same 5 websites you’ll see for every query on other engines because of that very criteria, Mojeek has way more diversity in sources.

        With all these corporations incentivized to further commercialize and consolidate the internet and with the rise of AI as a source of knowledge, Mojeek is one of the places I hang onto to explore a web of humans instead of a web of reputation and money.

        • Mojeek@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          Thanks a lot for sharing such a detailed rundown of what you find Mojeek to be useful for. I’ve shared this with the wider team.

          This being said, if you have things that you’d like to wing our way in terms of improvements, or feedback on individual results, our inbox is always open (aloe at mojeek dot com) and there’s a submit feedback button on results pages. Mojeek thrives and grows off of feedback, the good and the bad 🙏