A fixation on system change alone opens the door to a kind of cynical self-absolution that divorces personal commitment from political belief. This is its own kind of false consciousness, one that threatens to create a cheapened climate politics incommensurate with this urgent moment.

[…]

Because here’s the thing: When you choose to eat less meat or take the bus instead of driving or have fewer children, you are making a statement that your actions matter, that it’s not too late to avert climate catastrophe, that you have power. To take a measure of personal responsibility for climate change doesn’t have to distract from your political activism—if anything, it amplifies it.

  • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 hours ago

    That includes downstream emissions. So if your car runs on BP oil, those emissions would be part of BPs emissions.

    There is a reason BP is not advertising people to drop their cars. BP wants two things in its campaign. First of all to make clear that it is your lifestyles fault and secondly that besides munor changes you do not have to change that at all.

    • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They are responsible for those downstream emissions because they entrenched themselves and made it so the majority of people don’t have a choice. Even going so far as to influence how our cities are built to make us dependent on them.

      Most people cannot afford to get a car let alone an EV. The only reason we are seeing EVs in the first place is because of government intervention.

      If the individual doesn’t have a choice because of choices made by the fossil fuel industry then the individual isn’t responsible for those emissions.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        How do people die from not having a car? It must be a lot of them, given that most can not afford them, but depend on them…

        • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          You don’t know that people use cars to get to work? And get food?

          If I were to stop using fuel I would have no way to get to work and earn money. Which means no house or food or anything.

          Why does that need to be explained to you?

            • UsernameHere@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              Congrats. Now get 100% of the worlds population to do the same.

              Then you will have reduced less than 14% of the emissions needed.

              That’s why BP paid a marketing firm to get the public focused on their individual carbon footprint. So you waste your time trying to get 100% of the worlds population to change their individual carbon footprint.

              Instead of focusing on getting the majority of voters to protest and vote.