• Omniraptor@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    depressingly common, was even more common before we let women have rights

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      ‘we let’ women have rights? Women fought tooth and nail for years to get those rights, and assholes are still trying to claw them away; fuck, there’s places in the US right now where women are dying because their access to healthcare has been sabotaged by a supreme court that reinterpreted the constitution to remove their rights.

      • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        “we” in this case could be the American government in general and the supreme court specifically. The fact that such an important right was “granted” by a decision of nine random schmucks and can be taken away by another decision (rather than being a law) is not a great look for that government.

        But you’re right that it was not the best phrasing. Activism is extremely important esp on more local levels