psychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agoDevs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistantswww.cio.comexternal-linkmessage-square89fedilinkarrow-up1260arrow-down116cross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
arrow-up1244arrow-down1external-linkDevs gaining little (if anything) from AI coding assistantswww.cio.compsychothumbs@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square89fedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai@lemmy.world
minus-squareTony Bark@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down2·19 hours agoPlaces GPT-based “AI” next to flying cars
minus-squarePennomi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·18 hours agoFlying cars exist, they’re just not cost effective. AFAICT there’s no GPT that is proficient at coding yet.
minus-squareotp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·17 hours agoIt’s a lot easier to access ChatGPT than it is to access a flying car
minus-squaresepi@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down1·edit-216 hours agoThe more people using chatgpt to generate low quality code they don’t understand, the more job safety and greater salary I get.
Places GPT-based “AI” next to flying cars
Flying cars exist, they’re just not cost effective. AFAICT there’s no GPT that is proficient at coding yet.
It’s a lot easier to access ChatGPT than it is to access a flying car
The more people using chatgpt to generate low quality code they don’t understand, the more job safety and greater salary I get.