• Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    The American dream is to be a middle man who takes a cut while adding nothing, to have a captive consumer (sometimes literally), or to be to big to fail or regulate.

  • htrayl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Average new home in 1960: 1300 sq/ft. (without garage)

    Average new home in 2020: 2600 sq/ft (+ 2-3 car garage)

    Average household size in 1960: 3.4

    Average household size: 2.5

    Number of households with 2 or more vehicles in 1960: 22%

    Number of house holds with 2 or more vehicles in 2020: 59%

    Ya’ll, I don’t know how else to explain this - the reason home ownership and cost of living is expensive is very straightforward. We don’t build or accept smaller homes, we don’t build enough of them, and we spend far more on vehicles.

    Edit: if you want affordable housing, advocate (aka vote, canvas, donate) for candidates in your local government that support -

    • Zoning and regulations that benefits smaller home sizes.
    • Zoning that permits denser and missing middle development (for less need for vehicles)
    • Zoning that permits mixed use development.
    • Land Value Tax
    • Reduced or eliminated parking minimums
    • Bike infrastructure.
    • keegomatic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      This is a gross oversimplification and in part just illogical. Yes, new small homes would help everyone out. But compare house prices to purchasing power then vs. now. It’s absolutely incomparable to 1960. That’s not because of square footage. And car ownership as an input here makes no sense. The costs of a downpayment and mortgage are simply out of reach for many people irrespective of car count. I say all this as a homeowner.

      • htrayl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        It really is not. I’m not saying there are no other economic challenges, but the vast majority of housing costs are effectively caused by this.

        Here:

        The median home price in 1960 was around 20,000. In inflation adjusted 2020 dollars that would have been close to 200,000.

        This puts the price per square foot prices within the $100-150 range.

        In 2020, the price per square foot was in the same range.

        Wages have remained largely static. To be clear, this is NOT a good thing as productivity has skyrocketed, but is beside the point for now.

        Effectively, the reason why people cannot afford a mortgage is massively influenced by the average size of home.

        Cars make this fact even worse. On the mid to low income side of the economic spectrum, car ownership can easily cost 30% of household spending. A two car garage easily adds 10%+ to home costs.

        • keegomatic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Hm, you know, you’re right, that’s a fairer point than I expected. I think what I hadn’t appreciated (but do now, after thinking through your reply) was how much “back-pressure” the new home construction puts on the market. The current median house price is about double that 200k-equivalent figure, and while the growth in median house size doesn’t directly account for all of that, the availability of new houses is effectively throttled by the size increase so the prices of all houses rise.

          I think it was hard for me to imagine, because I have a fairly small house (1800 sq. ft) bought recently, no garage, built in the 50s, oil heating (very old), and it was 600k. Which is massively expensive compared to 200k and has none of the “big excessive new house” traits you’ve mentioned. Median is median, though, I suppose.