I really hate whenever I try to explain how some bad rules can be abused and immediatelly get someone say shit like “If this happens in your group, change it” as if that would solve the problem. And whenever it is not soemthing you witnessed personally, then it means it never happens and could never happen.

  • eerongal@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s legit not hard to make an OP/powerful character in either VtM or CoC, assuming youre talking about making a character good at combat (which is usually what people talk about in this context with power gaming). I don’t play PF2e, though, so i cant speak there.

    CoC take high dex, put 90+ in handguns, take the pulp talents rapid fire and quick draw, wear a bandolier of guns, and dual wield pistols that you fire 6 shots from per turn. If you dont care about going first, then fast load if you care about reloading, if not, then just take shadow and start combat hidden for two attacks with a bonus die at the start.

    For VtM its easy as take fist of caine and lightning strike. If you aren’t playing as elders, this requires gaining some exp first. I know there’s other combos that i cant think of off hand that are pretty potent too.

    Each of these do have counters in the form of monsters immune to guns (CoC), or celerity 5 opponents (VtM), but thats no different than a DM in D&D always throwing fireballs at the guy with high AC. It begins to be apparent when its happening all the time that the GM/DM/Keeper/whatever is specifically targeting your weakness.

    • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Minmaxxing isn’t really the same as rules exploits - you can do those things to become really good at combat, but you’re sacrificing your abilities in other areas, which make up a significant part of the game. It’s not like hiding behind a tower shield to disappear or undead warlocks short resting to stack death ward, where you’re actively taking advantage of wording and rules interactions to achieve unintended effects.

      • eerongal@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        i mean, if youre wanting exploitative rule mechanics based on wording/interactions, you need to look no further than base first aid and medicine in CoC; You’re able to make 1 of each per wound you take. Unlike older editions, they’ve done away with the heal cap on it, so if you’re down HP, simply deal yourself 1 HP of damage, make a first aid check. and then make a medicine check to heal at minimum 2 HP. Repeat until full. You can easily reheal yourself to full this way, which is definitely “unintended” based on how healing works (and older editions).

        Edit: at the end of the day, my point is that pretending other games cant or dont have exploitative mechanics/builds/whatever is naive at best? It’s not a D&D only problem. It’s just more prevalent in D&D because 1) it has more rules and 2) it has more players.

        • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think you’ve conflated part of those rules - there’s nothing in the medicine skill saying you can only do it once per wound, just first aid. So you can deal/restore 1 damage in between medicine checks, but that’s not what let’s you keep making medicine checks.

          • eerongal@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            A character is limited to one successful treatment of both First Aid and Medicine until further damage is taken.

            Pg. 65, under first aid.

            • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              So it is, I’d been looking at the damage and healing rules on 120. I’m sure that’s going to be fun to bring up at the table…

              Still, I don’t think that’s as egregious as something like pun-pun or sorlocks short resting to regain spells. There are exploits in other systems, but not at the level or frequency of D&D.

              • eerongal@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                yeah, unfortunately the CoC rules have always been kind of a mess. it still has a lot of that early RPG “stream of consciousness” aspect to it.

                But yeah, at the end of the day, the number of rules you have is far more relevant to how many “exploits” there are, so CoC/VtM being less “crunchy” will result in less exploits.

                • ProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I’d disagree on the second part, because of my other example, PF2e - the original had most of 3.x’s problems, but the code-like specificity of 2e is really showing it’s possible to stop stuff slipping through the cracks. There is a level of interplay between crunch and the possibility of exploitability, but I don’t think it’s as strict as bigger systems and more rules inherently lead to more exploits.

                  • eerongal@ttrpg.network
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I mean, as i stated, i can’t really vouch or argue against pf2e, since i dont play it and haven’t really read the rules of it since it was in playtest. That said, just googling, i see some things that could be considered exploits like a reddit thread talking about being able to do 520 damage in one attack, some chatter about a “resentment witch” being able to make power word stun or color spray effectively permanent, and a youtube video by the rules lawyer about “OP builds”, so it seems like there’s at least some system exploitation going on.

                    Obviously a tighter controlled system is less vulnerable to exploitation (see D&D 4e), but that also doesn’t mean that is necessarily doesn’t exist. Another counter example system with lots of rules and lots of exploitation of them would be shadowrun, especially older versions, which were even worse than D&D in some respects.

    • blackbelt352@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      For VtM its easy as take fist of caine and lightning strike.

      Yeah you ripped someone’s heart out in 3 seconds because your fast and strong, cool now you’re covered in blood and a walking Masquerade breach becaise you punched through someone’s ribcage The cops are on their way, second inquisition are listening in on radios, the Prince is disappointed that an elder is this careless and the sheriff is going to laugh at you as you’re turning to dust because disciplines can only do so much before you fall into torpor because you’re out of blood points/at max hunger.