• afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    The categorical imperative is cute but doesn’t work. It ignores all context for actions and assumes all people are pretty much the same.

    1. A surgeon is allowed to cut open people in an attempt to save them, me a person not medically trained is not allowed to do that. If you applied the rule “to save a person I am allowed to attempt to operate on them and do my best” to every person we would be in serious trouble.

    2. If I do a small bad thing it will prevent a very bad thing from happening. The categorical imperative forces me to ignore that fact.

    Also doesn’t really match how social animals operate and instead demands that we ignore how we are treated in our responses.

    1. I want people to be kind to each other. This particular person is never kind to me. The categorical imperative tells me that I am not supposed to take that into account and instead just shower resources on someone who has shown no appreciation for them in hopes that they eventually see the error of their ways. Despite having a winning strategy.

    Basically it puts way too much on people and demands that they be lawful stupid.

    • overcast5348@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Somebody who isn’t a pedant would interpret that as “All trained surgeons performing this procedure on their respective patients with the same condition would be fine. So me, a trained surgeon, performing this procedure is also fine.”