I thought he was like one of the most important whistleblowers of our time exposing war crimes and shit. Some of you don’t wanna see him live another day, why is that?

  • Emmy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Truthfully it was also articles about them releasing DNC hacks but refusing to do rnc hacks that seemed most obvious to me.

    At best they’re extremely partisan at worst they are a Russian asset.

    • xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      refusing to do rnc hacks

      no they did not! they never had leaks from the RNC and as such, could not release it.
      you know they don’t do any hacking, right?
      people (usually whistleblowers) leak info to wikiLEAKS, and then they verify it and publish it.
      they would love to do rnc leaks if they had that information…